The regulatory landscape in tuberculosis integrated research platforms

Background Tuberculosis (TB) is the infectious disease with the highest mortality burden globally. Despite a recently enriched drug pipeline, there has been limited advance in improving its treatment. Integrated research platforms (IRPs) provide a novel research framework which, by hosting adaptive platform trials, can streamline the evaluation of several new TB regimens, whilst reducing costs. However, there is no clear, evidence-based guidance on the use of IRPs for regulatory drug development in TB. Methods This consensus statement summarizes the discussion and recommendations produced during the European Union Patient centric clinical trial platforms (EU-PEARL) project. A multidisciplinary task force reviewed the literature regarding regulatory pathways for IRP with special focus on TB and identified current gaps and needs, which were discussed by an extended panel in two consultations. Here we summarise the output of this process and propose possible ways to advance in the implementation of such platforms. Results and conclusion IRP coordinators are advised to seek an early contact with national regulators and supranational organisms, including regulatory collaboration initiatives. To ensure regulatory acceptance, IRP must prioritize careful design, including clear decision rules for phase transitions, and the development of surrogate makers. Furthermore, data leverage and stratification across groups could enhance IRP success. These efforts will not only strengthen the scientific validity of the IRP but also enhance its regulatory acceptability and impact on global TB treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00646-2026
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The regulatory landscape in tuberculosis integrated research platforms

Juan Espinosa‐Pereiro, Marco Cavaleri, Christian Lienhardt, Adrián Sánchez‐Montalvá et al.
European Respiratory Journal
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

The regulatory landscape in tuberculosis integrated research platforms

Juan Espinosa‐Pereiro, Marco Cavaleri, Christian Lienhardt, Adrián Sánchez‐Montalvá, Francesca Saluzzo, Jesús González-Moreno, Norbert Hittel, Daniela María Cirillo, Karin Rombouts, Ulrika Simonsson
article en

Abstract

Background Tuberculosis (TB) is the infectious disease with the highest mortality burden globally. Despite a recently enriched drug pipeline, there has been limited advance in improving its treatment. Integrated research platforms (IRPs) provide a novel research framework which, by hosting adaptive platform trials, can streamline the evaluation of several new TB regimens, whilst reducing costs. However, there is no clear, evidence-based guidance on the use of IRPs for regulatory drug development in TB. Methods This consensus statement summarizes the discussion and recommendations produced during the European Union Patient centric clinical trial platforms (EU-PEARL) project. A multidisciplinary task force reviewed the literature regarding regulatory pathways for IRP with special focus on TB and identified current gaps and needs, which were discussed by an extended panel in two consultations. Here we summarise the output of this process and propose possible ways to advance in the implementation of such platforms. Results and conclusion IRP coordinators are advised to seek an early contact with national regulators and supranational organisms, including regulatory collaboration initiatives. To ensure regulatory acceptance, IRP must prioritize careful design, including clear decision rules for phase transitions, and the development of surrogate makers. Furthermore, data leverage and stratification across groups could enhance IRP success. These efforts will not only strengthen the scientific validity of the IRP but also enhance its regulatory acceptability and impact on global TB treatment strategies.

European Respiratory Journal
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Uppsala University (SE), European Medicines Agency (NL), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), San Raffaele University of Rome (IT), Novel (Germany) (DE), Institute for Sustainable Development (ET), Université André Salifou (NE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.