Mapping digital welfare platforms globally: functional typologies, governance gaps, and policy implications

Abstract This study presents the first comprehensive global mapping and inductive classification of digital welfare platforms. Drawing on an original dataset of 285 cases spanning diverse institutional and geographical contexts, it identifies five core functional types: service delivery, information repository, search engine, value co-creation, and community-building. Using a multidimensional descriptive approach and a structured decision-tree model, the analysis reveals significant divergence in governance arrangements, user orientation, monetisation strategies, and business models. While digital platforms are often promoted as tools for enhancing accessibility and efficiency, the findings expose critical systemic voids – particularly in public sector involvement, youth-focused provision, and accountability mechanisms. The study highlights the fragmented and commercially skewed nature of emerging digital welfare infrastructures, raising pressing concerns about equity, inclusion, and the normative trajectories shaping welfare governance in the platform era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Economics Policy and Law
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744133126100747
Primary Topic
Service and Product Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Mapping digital welfare platforms globally: functional typologies, governance gaps, and policy implications

Agnese Palvarini
Health Economics Policy and Law
Service and Product Innovation
article

Mapping digital welfare platforms globally: functional typologies, governance gaps, and policy implications

Agnese Palvarini
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study presents the first comprehensive global mapping and inductive classification of digital welfare platforms. Drawing on an original dataset of 285 cases spanning diverse institutional and geographical contexts, it identifies five core functional types: service delivery, information repository, search engine, value co-creation, and community-building. Using a multidimensional descriptive approach and a structured decision-tree model, the analysis reveals significant divergence in governance arrangements, user orientation, monetisation strategies, and business models. While digital platforms are often promoted as tools for enhancing accessibility and efficiency, the findings expose critical systemic voids – particularly in public sector involvement, youth-focused provision, and accountability mechanisms. The study highlights the fragmented and commercially skewed nature of emerging digital welfare infrastructures, raising pressing concerns about equity, inclusion, and the normative trajectories shaping welfare governance in the platform era.

Health Economics Policy and Law
Imperial College London (GB), Bocconi University (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Service and Product Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.