Sampling Matters: Molecular Dynamics Insights into How Sampling Density and Distribution Affect the Capacitance and Energy Predictions in Hydrated Ionic Liquid Supercapacitors

Abstract Accurate predictions of capacitance and energy storage in electrochemical systems depend critically on how the charge–potential response is sampled. In this work, we investigate how data resolution and sampling strategy affect capacitance and energy estimates in graphene-based supercapacitors using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a partially hydrated ionic liquid. To this end, we compare projected and differential capacitance approaches and their associated energy estimates using complete, uniformly reduced, and nonuniformly sampled data sets. Linear fits of the potential–charge relationship, Φ(σ), provide a robust estimate of the average projected capacitance and are relatively insensitive to sampling density. However, because the projected approach compresses the full electrostatic response into a single effective slope, it cannot resolve local capacitance variations or directly determine the capacitance at the point of zero charge (PZC). In contrast, the differential capacitance, derived from cubic fits of the charge–potential relationship, σ(Φ), provides a local, potential-resolved reconstruction of the electrostatic response, but is more sensitive to sparse or uneven sampling because it depends on the curvature of the fitted response. These methodological differences are propagated into the energy estimates: the projected energy follows the ideal quadratic voltage dependence of a constant-capacitance model, whereas the integrated energy reflects the voltage-dependent capacitance profile and captures deviations from ideal linear-capacitor behavior. By comparing edge-dominated and PZC-centered data sets, we show that different regions of the electrostatic phase space probe distinct electrostatic regimes. Sampling near the PZC captures the near-equilibrium response, whereas edge-dominated sampling emphasizes the strongly polarized regime. These results provide practical guidelines for molecular simulations of electrochemical interfaces and show that reliable capacitance and energy estimates require control not only over the number of sampled points, but also over their distribution across the full polarization range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6c04897
Primary Topic
Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Sampling Matters: Molecular Dynamics Insights into How Sampling Density and Distribution Affect the Capacitance and Energy Predictions in Hydrated Ionic Liquid Supercapacitors

Guilherme Colherinhas, Henrique de Araujo Chagas, Leonardo Bruno Assis Oliveira, Tertius Lima Fonseca et al.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
article

Sampling Matters: Molecular Dynamics Insights into How Sampling Density and Distribution Affect the Capacitance and Energy Predictions in Hydrated Ionic Liquid Supercapacitors

Guilherme Colherinhas, Henrique de Araujo Chagas, Leonardo Bruno Assis Oliveira, Tertius Lima Fonseca, Lucas de S. Silva
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurate predictions of capacitance and energy storage in electrochemical systems depend critically on how the charge–potential response is sampled. In this work, we investigate how data resolution and sampling strategy affect capacitance and energy estimates in graphene-based supercapacitors using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a partially hydrated ionic liquid. To this end, we compare projected and differential capacitance approaches and their associated energy estimates using complete, uniformly reduced, and nonuniformly sampled data sets. Linear fits of the potential–charge relationship, Φ(σ), provide a robust estimate of the average projected capacitance and are relatively insensitive to sampling density. However, because the projected approach compresses the full electrostatic response into a single effective slope, it cannot resolve local capacitance variations or directly determine the capacitance at the point of zero charge (PZC). In contrast, the differential capacitance, derived from cubic fits of the charge–potential relationship, σ(Φ), provides a local, potential-resolved reconstruction of the electrostatic response, but is more sensitive to sparse or uneven sampling because it depends on the curvature of the fitted response. These methodological differences are propagated into the energy estimates: the projected energy follows the ideal quadratic voltage dependence of a constant-capacitance model, whereas the integrated energy reflects the voltage-dependent capacitance profile and captures deviations from ideal linear-capacitor behavior. By comparing edge-dominated and PZC-centered data sets, we show that different regions of the electrostatic phase space probe distinct electrostatic regimes. Sampling near the PZC captures the near-equilibrium response, whereas edge-dominated sampling emphasizes the strongly polarized regime. These results provide practical guidelines for molecular simulations of electrochemical interfaces and show that reliable capacitance and energy estimates require control not only over the number of sampled points, but also over their distribution across the full polarization range.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.