Simulation and Optimization of the Ecological Networks in the Middle Yangtze River Basin

Exploring the simulation and optimization pathways of ecological networks under multiple scenarios is conducive to ensuring ecological security and achieving high-quality development of urban agglomerations. In this study, the PLUS model was utilized to perform spatial simulations of land use change in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River under four alternative scenarios: natural development (ND), ecological protection (EP), cropland protection (CP), and economic development (ED). By integrating the InVEST and MSPA models with circuit theory, ecological networks and ecological security patterns were constructed within a dual-temporal framework of “past and future”. On this basis, ecological management zoning and corresponding optimization pathways were explored across different scenarios. The results indicated that: (1) During the period 2000–2020, land use in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River was dominated by cropland and forestland. (2) Multi-scenario land use types showed divergent evolutionary trends. The ND scenario maintained the historical pattern; the EP scenario increased ecological land by 1.2%; the CP scenario expanded cropland by 11.74%; and the ED scenario raised construction land by 33.78%. (3) During the two decades, the habitat quality and landscape configuration of the study area remained largely stable. The connectivity of ecological corridors across scenarios ranked as EP > ND > ED > CP. Consequently, ecological networks under multiple scenarios and an ecological security pattern characterized by “three barriers, four corridors, three belts, and multiple nodes” were established. (4) The urban agglomeration was classified into three major categories of ecological priority conservation zones, namely ecological source conservation zones, ecological source coordination zones, and ecological source restoration zones, along with five levels of ecological management zones. Based on this classification, zoning optimization strategies were explored under multiple scenarios. This study provides valuable guidance for ensuring ecological security and implementing differentiated, multi-level ecological management strategies in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15101792
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Simulation and Optimization of the Ecological Networks in the Middle Yangtze River Basin

Guoxing Huang, Wanmei Chen, Guoqing Li, Yongwu Dai et al.
Land
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Simulation and Optimization of the Ecological Networks in the Middle Yangtze River Basin

Guoxing Huang, Wanmei Chen, Guoqing Li, Yongwu Dai, X F Hong, Jixing Huang, Jinhuang Lin, Youquan Ouyang
article en

Abstract

Exploring the simulation and optimization pathways of ecological networks under multiple scenarios is conducive to ensuring ecological security and achieving high-quality development of urban agglomerations. In this study, the PLUS model was utilized to perform spatial simulations of land use change in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River under four alternative scenarios: natural development (ND), ecological protection (EP), cropland protection (CP), and economic development (ED). By integrating the InVEST and MSPA models with circuit theory, ecological networks and ecological security patterns were constructed within a dual-temporal framework of “past and future”. On this basis, ecological management zoning and corresponding optimization pathways were explored across different scenarios. The results indicated that: (1) During the period 2000–2020, land use in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River was dominated by cropland and forestland. (2) Multi-scenario land use types showed divergent evolutionary trends. The ND scenario maintained the historical pattern; the EP scenario increased ecological land by 1.2%; the CP scenario expanded cropland by 11.74%; and the ED scenario raised construction land by 33.78%. (3) During the two decades, the habitat quality and landscape configuration of the study area remained largely stable. The connectivity of ecological corridors across scenarios ranked as EP > ND > ED > CP. Consequently, ecological networks under multiple scenarios and an ecological security pattern characterized by “three barriers, four corridors, three belts, and multiple nodes” were established. (4) The urban agglomeration was classified into three major categories of ecological priority conservation zones, namely ecological source conservation zones, ecological source coordination zones, and ecological source restoration zones, along with five levels of ecological management zones. Based on this classification, zoning optimization strategies were explored under multiple scenarios. This study provides valuable guidance for ensuring ecological security and implementing differentiated, multi-level ecological management strategies in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.

LandVol. 15(10)
Chinese Academy of Forestry (CN), Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information (CN), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.