Invited Perspectives: Science for Comprehensive Disaster and Climate Risk Management

In this paper, we explore five core challenges that need to be addressed in order to move towards the Comprehensive Disaster and Climate Risk Management approach, which has been proposed within the newly emerging paradigm of a more holistic approach to managing the risks associated with climatic and/or non-climatic hazards and non-climatic risk drivers across varied time scales and levels. These five challenges relate to the following points. First, we have a lack of comprehensive and high quality data for observing how society is impacted by, prepares for, and responds to multi-risks. Second, as a result we have a limited understanding of why individuals, communities, and other decision-makers (fail to) prepare for complex multi-risks in the way they do, and how that affects their responses. Third, our capacity to simulate how current and future risk could be effectively reduced is hampered by the aforementioned lack and fragmentation of observations and understanding of multi-risk dynamics. Fourth, current governance structures often reinforce data and knowledge silos. Fifth, the high complexity and wicked nature of the multi-risk problem results in barriers in knowledge exchange at the science, policy and practice interface. In this paper, we elaborate on each of these challenges, discuss why they matter for comprehensive disaster risk management, and provide ideas of how to overcome these challenges. We end the paper with a brief outlook.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4589-2026
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Invited Perspectives: Science for Comprehensive Disaster and Climate Risk Management

Nicole van Maanen, Funda Atún, C.J. van Westen, Srijith Balakrishnan et al.
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Invited Perspectives: Science for Comprehensive Disaster and Climate Risk Management

Nicole van Maanen, Funda Atún, C.J. van Westen, Srijith Balakrishnan, Marc J. C. Van den Homberg, Carmen Anthonj, Goda Perlaviciute, Eefje Hendriks, Rodrigo Mena Flühmann, Tina Comes, Jens de Bruijn, Jasper Verschuur, Tomris Cesuroğlu, Ashok Dahal, Kees Boersma, Marleen de Ruiter, Sonja Fransen, Anja Schreijer, Nathan Clark, Linda Steg, Philip J. Ward
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we explore five core challenges that need to be addressed in order to move towards the Comprehensive Disaster and Climate Risk Management approach, which has been proposed within the newly emerging paradigm of a more holistic approach to managing the risks associated with climatic and/or non-climatic hazards and non-climatic risk drivers across varied time scales and levels. These five challenges relate to the following points. First, we have a lack of comprehensive and high quality data for observing how society is impacted by, prepares for, and responds to multi-risks. Second, as a result we have a limited understanding of why individuals, communities, and other decision-makers (fail to) prepare for complex multi-risks in the way they do, and how that affects their responses. Third, our capacity to simulate how current and future risk could be effectively reduced is hampered by the aforementioned lack and fragmentation of observations and understanding of multi-risk dynamics. Fourth, current governance structures often reinforce data and knowledge silos. Fifth, the high complexity and wicked nature of the multi-risk problem results in barriers in knowledge exchange at the science, policy and practice interface. In this paper, we elaborate on each of these challenges, discuss why they matter for comprehensive disaster risk management, and provide ideas of how to overcome these challenges. We end the paper with a brief outlook.

Natural hazards and earth system sciencesVol. 26(9)
University of Groningen (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Red Cross Hospital (GR), Deltares (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), University of Twente (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.