Platform development in incumbent firms: The interplay of data and actor interests in adding platforms to existing businesses

Abstract Research Summary Despite growing interest in platform transitions, limited research examines how firms navigate challenges of building platform businesses alongside existing products. Through a longitudinal case study of a financial services firm launching a platform, we develop a process model revealing how data bottlenecks shape platform development. These bottlenecks arise from the interplay of technological limitations and control tensions over data aggregation, sharing, and usage. We identify five sequential bottlenecks, where resolving one reconfigures constraints, giving rise to the next. We theorize how data heterogeneity, variation in strategic sensitivity, and actors' absorptive capacity create opportunities for platform sponsors to capture value without competing with complementors. We extend resource dependency theory by showing how peripheral units overcome power imbalances by demonstrating value creation potential with limited data. Managerial Summary When established firms launch platforms alongside existing product businesses, they face significant data‐related obstacles. Drawing on a four‐year study of a financial services firm building a platform connecting SMEs with lenders, we show how firms must navigate challenges in collecting data from internal units and customers, making incompatible data sources work together, and persuading partners to share and use data in new ways. We find that these obstacles emerge in sequence, where resolving one creates the conditions for the next. We also find that not all data is equally useful to all partners, and that these differences can open market segments the platform sponsor can serve without competing with its own partners. Managers can maintain momentum by combining short‐term data workarounds with longer‐term structural solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Management Journal
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70124
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Platform development in incumbent firms: The interplay of data and actor interests in adding platforms to existing businesses

Jack Lewis Fraser, Pınar Özcan, Elizabeth J. Altman
Strategic Management Journal
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Platform development in incumbent firms: The interplay of data and actor interests in adding platforms to existing businesses

Jack Lewis Fraser, Pınar Özcan, Elizabeth J. Altman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Research Summary Despite growing interest in platform transitions, limited research examines how firms navigate challenges of building platform businesses alongside existing products. Through a longitudinal case study of a financial services firm launching a platform, we develop a process model revealing how data bottlenecks shape platform development. These bottlenecks arise from the interplay of technological limitations and control tensions over data aggregation, sharing, and usage. We identify five sequential bottlenecks, where resolving one reconfigures constraints, giving rise to the next. We theorize how data heterogeneity, variation in strategic sensitivity, and actors' absorptive capacity create opportunities for platform sponsors to capture value without competing with complementors. We extend resource dependency theory by showing how peripheral units overcome power imbalances by demonstrating value creation potential with limited data. Managerial Summary When established firms launch platforms alongside existing product businesses, they face significant data‐related obstacles. Drawing on a four‐year study of a financial services firm building a platform connecting SMEs with lenders, we show how firms must navigate challenges in collecting data from internal units and customers, making incompatible data sources work together, and persuading partners to share and use data in new ways. We find that these obstacles emerge in sequence, where resolving one creates the conditions for the next. We also find that not all data is equally useful to all partners, and that these differences can open market segments the platform sponsor can serve without competing with its own partners. Managers can maintain momentum by combining short‐term data workarounds with longer‐term structural solutions.

Strategic Management Journal
University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), University of Oxford (GB), NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.