Ethical analysis of European Court of Human Rights fertility preservation cases from 2000 to 2025

Summary Background Fertility preservation helps individuals to retain reproductive potential. Linked to human rights, it can raise complex issues before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). This research aims to ethically analyse ECtHR fertility preservation cases. Methods Fertility preservation cases from the ECtHR (2000–2025) were searched in the Human Rights Documentation (HUDOC) database. Three cases were identified. As a team with ethics expertise, we analysed the cases using the four principles of bioethics. Results The principle of autonomy highlighted the complexity of posthumous reproduction even with explicit consent. Challenges in balancing the child’s welfare with other parties’ interests were revealed. Social Justice focused on equal treatment and fair access. Conclusion The cases focused on diverse aspects of informed consent while underscoring the importance of the informational content. Ethical challenges related to the background of diverse national laws demonstrate the need for unified legislation and highlight the potential role that clinical ethics consultations can play where laws are absent or unclear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-026-01190-3
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Ethical analysis of European Court of Human Rights fertility preservation cases from 2000 to 2025

Marcin Orzechowski, S Aleksandrova–Yankulovska, Karin Bundschu, Katharina Hancke et al.
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Ethical analysis of European Court of Human Rights fertility preservation cases from 2000 to 2025

Marcin Orzechowski, S Aleksandrova–Yankulovska, Karin Bundschu, Katharina Hancke, Florian Steger
article en

Abstract

Summary Background Fertility preservation helps individuals to retain reproductive potential. Linked to human rights, it can raise complex issues before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). This research aims to ethically analyse ECtHR fertility preservation cases. Methods Fertility preservation cases from the ECtHR (2000–2025) were searched in the Human Rights Documentation (HUDOC) database. Three cases were identified. As a team with ethics expertise, we analysed the cases using the four principles of bioethics. Results The principle of autonomy highlighted the complexity of posthumous reproduction even with explicit consent. Challenges in balancing the child’s welfare with other parties’ interests were revealed. Social Justice focused on equal treatment and fair access. Conclusion The cases focused on diverse aspects of informed consent while underscoring the importance of the informational content. Ethical challenges related to the background of diverse national laws demonstrate the need for unified legislation and highlight the potential role that clinical ethics consultations can play where laws are absent or unclear.

Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
Universität Ulm (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE), Technische Hochschule Ulm (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical analysis of European Court of Human Rights fertility preservation cases from 2000 to 2025 — Marcin Orzechowski, S Aleksandrova–Yankulovska, et al. · Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS