Leaders or Followers? Individual‐Level Sustainability Orientations on Corporate Social Responsibility and Their Theoretical Drivers

ABSTRACT Although the literature on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) increasingly recognizes the coexistence of multiple theoretical frameworks at the organizational level, little is known about how individual professionals internalize and combine these frameworks in managerial practice. This study fills this gap by analyzing management engineers, who play a key role in translating corporate sustainability strategies into operational decisions. Through a sequential, two‐phase research design, an exploratory analysis based on Principal Component Analysis and K‐means clustering identifies two distinct profiles (Sustainability Leaders and Sustainability Followers) which were subsequently validated through a second questionnaire, in which respondents self‐identified with the profiles and evaluated five organizational theories. The results show that the two groups do not differ in digital skills, which are now widespread across the board, but rather in how they integrate sustainability, stakeholder engagement, and systems thinking into their decisions. A regression analysis reveals that Stakeholder Theory positively explains membership in the Leader profile, while Institutional Theory characterizes the Follower profile. This study contributes to research on CSR by demonstrating that sustainability orientations at the individual level are based on distinct theoretical frameworks, thereby extending the analysis of CSR from organizational strategies to the professionals responsible for their implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.71026
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Leaders or Followers? Individual‐Level Sustainability Orientations on Corporate Social Responsibility and Their Theoretical Drivers

Idiano D’Adamo, Simone Di Leo, Chiara Grosso
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Leaders or Followers? Individual‐Level Sustainability Orientations on Corporate Social Responsibility and Their Theoretical Drivers

Idiano D’Adamo, Simone Di Leo, Chiara Grosso
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although the literature on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) increasingly recognizes the coexistence of multiple theoretical frameworks at the organizational level, little is known about how individual professionals internalize and combine these frameworks in managerial practice. This study fills this gap by analyzing management engineers, who play a key role in translating corporate sustainability strategies into operational decisions. Through a sequential, two‐phase research design, an exploratory analysis based on Principal Component Analysis and K‐means clustering identifies two distinct profiles (Sustainability Leaders and Sustainability Followers) which were subsequently validated through a second questionnaire, in which respondents self‐identified with the profiles and evaluated five organizational theories. The results show that the two groups do not differ in digital skills, which are now widespread across the board, but rather in how they integrate sustainability, stakeholder engagement, and systems thinking into their decisions. A regression analysis reveals that Stakeholder Theory positively explains membership in the Leader profile, while Institutional Theory characterizes the Follower profile. This study contributes to research on CSR by demonstrating that sustainability orientations at the individual level are based on distinct theoretical frameworks, thereby extending the analysis of CSR from organizational strategies to the professionals responsible for their implementation.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.