Insubordination in interaction

Abstract This study examines a particular type of insubordinate clause in Hebrew that comprises an ironic utterance prefaced by the Hebrew causal conjunction ki ‘because.’ Our analysis reveals that in casual face-to-face interaction, ki -prefaced ironic clauses, although formally marked as subordinate of the causal variety, may function as comments conveying a negative stance toward a prior utterance, ridiculing or challenging it by appealing to shared knowledge or common sense. We further demonstrate that the use of these ki -clauses is often accompanied by particular embodied cues that index distancing from the content and facilitate the recognition of irony. In line with recent work on insubordination, we show that these clauses resist traditional subordinate-causal categorizations and require a usage-based, interactionally grounded analysis instead. By exploring this ki -prefaced construction, our study contributes both to the typology of insubordination and to the understanding of how causal clauses are recruited for stance-taking in everyday Hebrew conversation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interactional Linguistics
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.25017.inb
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Insubordination in interaction

Yael Maschler, Anna Inbar
Interactional Linguistics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Insubordination in interaction

Yael Maschler, Anna Inbar
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines a particular type of insubordinate clause in Hebrew that comprises an ironic utterance prefaced by the Hebrew causal conjunction ki ‘because.’ Our analysis reveals that in casual face-to-face interaction, ki -prefaced ironic clauses, although formally marked as subordinate of the causal variety, may function as comments conveying a negative stance toward a prior utterance, ridiculing or challenging it by appealing to shared knowledge or common sense. We further demonstrate that the use of these ki -clauses is often accompanied by particular embodied cues that index distancing from the content and facilitate the recognition of irony. In line with recent work on insubordination, we show that these clauses resist traditional subordinate-causal categorizations and require a usage-based, interactionally grounded analysis instead. By exploring this ki -prefaced construction, our study contributes both to the typology of insubordination and to the understanding of how causal clauses are recruited for stance-taking in everyday Hebrew conversation.

Interactional Linguistics
Bar-Ilan University (IL), University of Haifa (IL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Insubordination in interaction — Yael Maschler, Anna Inbar · Interactional Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS