Comparative Analysis of Genotoxic Modes of Action and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Four Classes of Unregulated DBPs in Human Uroepithelial (SV-HUC-1) Cells

Abstract Increasing evidence suggests that the contribution of unregulated disinfection by-products (UR-DBPs) to the overall toxicity of disinfected water is underestimated. However, the molecular mechanisms by which they promote bladder carcinogenesis remain largely unexplored. Using the nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cell line SV-HUC-1, we sought to elucidate the potential genotoxic mechanisms underlying the bladder cancer risk associated with four classes of typical UR-DBPs: haloacetonitriles (HANs), haloacetamides (HAMs), halobenzoquinones (HBQs), and halobenzoquinone imines (HQCs). Genotoxicity was evaluated by the SOS/umu assay and the micronucleus assay. Only three of the eight UR-DBPs gave positive SOS/umu responses. However, all tested UR-DBPs showed clear cytotoxicity and micronucleus effects, with a consistent toxicity order: HANs > HAMs > HBQs and HQCs. Principal component analysis (PCA) of transcriptomic data indicated that the eight UR-DBPs may act through two distinct modes of action (MOAs). Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) further revealed that HANs and HAMs activated DNA repair pathways, including base excision repair (BER) and nonhomologous end-joining for double-strand break repair (DSBR-NHEJ), while HBQs and HQCs suppressed DNA damage repair pathways or the regulatory pathways involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), and double-strand break repair (DSBR). Western blotting confirmed that HBQs and HQCs significantly downregulated proteins critical for DNA damage repair regulation. This is possibly attributable to their stronger protein-binding capacities relative to other UR-DBPs. Collectively, these findings argue that the impairment of DNA repair regulation constitutes a distinct genotoxic mechanism that should be integrated into DBP risk evaluation alongside direct DNA damage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6c00291
Primary Topic
Water Treatment and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative Analysis of Genotoxic Modes of Action and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Four Classes of Unregulated DBPs in Human Uroepithelial (SV-HUC-1) Cells

Shuo Zhang, Xiaohong Zhou, Y. L. Han, Mei Ma
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Water Treatment and Disinfection
article

Comparative Analysis of Genotoxic Modes of Action and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Four Classes of Unregulated DBPs in Human Uroepithelial (SV-HUC-1) Cells

Shuo Zhang, Xiaohong Zhou, Y. L. Han, Mei Ma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Increasing evidence suggests that the contribution of unregulated disinfection by-products (UR-DBPs) to the overall toxicity of disinfected water is underestimated. However, the molecular mechanisms by which they promote bladder carcinogenesis remain largely unexplored. Using the nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cell line SV-HUC-1, we sought to elucidate the potential genotoxic mechanisms underlying the bladder cancer risk associated with four classes of typical UR-DBPs: haloacetonitriles (HANs), haloacetamides (HAMs), halobenzoquinones (HBQs), and halobenzoquinone imines (HQCs). Genotoxicity was evaluated by the SOS/umu assay and the micronucleus assay. Only three of the eight UR-DBPs gave positive SOS/umu responses. However, all tested UR-DBPs showed clear cytotoxicity and micronucleus effects, with a consistent toxicity order: HANs > HAMs > HBQs and HQCs. Principal component analysis (PCA) of transcriptomic data indicated that the eight UR-DBPs may act through two distinct modes of action (MOAs). Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) further revealed that HANs and HAMs activated DNA repair pathways, including base excision repair (BER) and nonhomologous end-joining for double-strand break repair (DSBR-NHEJ), while HBQs and HQCs suppressed DNA damage repair pathways or the regulatory pathways involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), and double-strand break repair (DSBR). Western blotting confirmed that HBQs and HQCs significantly downregulated proteins critical for DNA damage repair regulation. This is possibly attributable to their stronger protein-binding capacities relative to other UR-DBPs. Collectively, these findings argue that the impairment of DNA repair regulation constitutes a distinct genotoxic mechanism that should be integrated into DBP risk evaluation alongside direct DNA damage.

Chemical Research in Toxicology
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Water Treatment and Disinfection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.