Disparities in Cancer Incidence by Sex and Associated Lifestyle Factors and Health Conditions

Importance Cancer risk is higher in males than females globally. Whether this sex disparity reflects a biological inevitability or is potentially modifiable by lifestyle behaviors and health conditions across diverse populations remains unclear. Objective To determine the contribution of lifestyle factors and health conditions to sex disparities in cancer incidence across populations. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study conducted an individual-level analysis of 3 population-based prospective cohorts in China (Shanghai Men’s Health Study and Shanghai Women’s Health Study) and the UK (UK Biobank) of adults aged 40 to 74 years at baseline with no prior cancer. Baseline data were collected from 1997 to 2010, with follow-up through 2021. Data were analyzed from September 2025 to June 2026. Exposures Eleven risk factors covering behaviors (smoking, heavy alcohol drinking, physical inactivity), diet (low intakes of vegetable and fruit, high intakes of red meat and processed meat), and health conditions (cholelithiasis, chronic liver diseases, diabetes, obesity). Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence of 34 non−sex-specific cancer end points. Attributable rate differences (ARDs, cases per 100 000 person-years) and attributable proportion (AP, %) quantified the number and percentage of the male-female incidence rate gap attributable to the exposures. Results Among a total of 589 766 participants (mean [SD] age, 56.1 [8.5] years; 315 813 [53.5%] females), 70 300 non−sex-specific cancer cases were documented. In the Chinese population (134 742 participants [54.4% female]), the joint ARD across the 11 risk factors was 182.52 (95% CI, 162.46-202.26) cases per 100 000 person-years, accounting for 84.44% of the male-female incidence rate difference. Smoking (ARD, 111.87 [95% CI, 95.38-128.00]; AP, 51.75%) and heavy alcohol drinking (ARD, 32.64 [95% CI, 24.61-40.43]; AP, 15.10%) were leading contributors. In the UK population (455 024 participants [53.3% female]), the joint ARD was 52.31 (95% CI, 35.63-70.22) cases per 100 000 person-years, accounting for 26.21% of the sex disparity. Obesity (ARD, 15.34 [95% CI, 6.06-24.08]; AP, 7.68%) and smoking (ARD, 12.49 [95% CI, 1.82-24.39]; AP, 6.26%) were leading individual contributors. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that modifiable lifestyle factors and health conditions accounted for most of the male-female cancer incidence gap in the Chinese population but only a small fraction in the UK population. Reducing cancer sex disparities may require prevention strategies tailored to population contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Oncology
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.3747
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Disparities in Cancer Incidence by Sex and Associated Lifestyle Factors and Health Conditions

Zhuoying Li, Yong-Bing Xiang, Dan-Ni Yang, Qiu-Ming Shen et al.
JAMA Oncology
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Disparities in Cancer Incidence by Sex and Associated Lifestyle Factors and Health Conditions

Zhuoying Li, Yong-Bing Xiang, Dan-Ni Yang, Qiu-Ming Shen, Yu-Ting Tan, Hong-Lan Li
article en

Abstract

Importance Cancer risk is higher in males than females globally. Whether this sex disparity reflects a biological inevitability or is potentially modifiable by lifestyle behaviors and health conditions across diverse populations remains unclear. Objective To determine the contribution of lifestyle factors and health conditions to sex disparities in cancer incidence across populations. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study conducted an individual-level analysis of 3 population-based prospective cohorts in China (Shanghai Men’s Health Study and Shanghai Women’s Health Study) and the UK (UK Biobank) of adults aged 40 to 74 years at baseline with no prior cancer. Baseline data were collected from 1997 to 2010, with follow-up through 2021. Data were analyzed from September 2025 to June 2026. Exposures Eleven risk factors covering behaviors (smoking, heavy alcohol drinking, physical inactivity), diet (low intakes of vegetable and fruit, high intakes of red meat and processed meat), and health conditions (cholelithiasis, chronic liver diseases, diabetes, obesity). Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence of 34 non−sex-specific cancer end points. Attributable rate differences (ARDs, cases per 100 000 person-years) and attributable proportion (AP, %) quantified the number and percentage of the male-female incidence rate gap attributable to the exposures. Results Among a total of 589 766 participants (mean [SD] age, 56.1 [8.5] years; 315 813 [53.5%] females), 70 300 non−sex-specific cancer cases were documented. In the Chinese population (134 742 participants [54.4% female]), the joint ARD across the 11 risk factors was 182.52 (95% CI, 162.46-202.26) cases per 100 000 person-years, accounting for 84.44% of the male-female incidence rate difference. Smoking (ARD, 111.87 [95% CI, 95.38-128.00]; AP, 51.75%) and heavy alcohol drinking (ARD, 32.64 [95% CI, 24.61-40.43]; AP, 15.10%) were leading contributors. In the UK population (455 024 participants [53.3% female]), the joint ARD was 52.31 (95% CI, 35.63-70.22) cases per 100 000 person-years, accounting for 26.21% of the sex disparity. Obesity (ARD, 15.34 [95% CI, 6.06-24.08]; AP, 7.68%) and smoking (ARD, 12.49 [95% CI, 1.82-24.39]; AP, 6.26%) were leading individual contributors. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that modifiable lifestyle factors and health conditions accounted for most of the male-female cancer incidence gap in the Chinese population but only a small fraction in the UK population. Reducing cancer sex disparities may require prevention strategies tailored to population contexts.

JAMA Oncology
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Renji Hospital (CN), Shanghai Cancer Institute (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.