Dimensions of Loneliness Among Older Adults in Osijek-Baranja County: Associations with Sociodemographic, Family, and Social Characteristics

Background/Objectives: Loneliness among older adults is a public health concern associated with adverse health and well-being outcomes, yet evidence from eastern Croatia remains limited. This study examined social loneliness, family loneliness, and loneliness in romantic relationships among adults aged ≥65 years and their associations with sociodemographic, family, and social characteristics. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 431 community-dwelling older adults in Osijek-Baranja County from January to April 2025. Loneliness was assessed using the Croatian adaptation of the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale. Group differences and correlations were examined using nonparametric methods, followed by separate multiple linear regression models with HC3 robust standard errors. Results: Median scores were 38 (29–47) for social loneliness, 20 (14–29) for family loneliness, and 41 (27–50) for loneliness in romantic relationships. Poorer perceived family-contact quality was associated with higher social and family loneliness in the adjusted models. Compared with good-quality contact, poor-quality contact was associated with social- and family-loneliness scores that were 19.66 and 25.52 points higher, respectively (both p < 0.001). Men and suburban residents had higher social loneliness in bivariate analyses, but sex and residence were not significant in the adjusted model. After adjustment for age, never-married, divorced, and widowed participants had romantic-loneliness scores 14.66, 21.55, and 15.58 points higher than married participants, respectively (all p < 0.001). Older age was weakly and positively correlated with social loneliness (ρ = 0.148; p = 0.002) and loneliness in romantic relationships (ρ = 0.194; p < 0.001). Family-contact frequency was not significant overall in the adjusted social and family loneliness models. Conclusions: Perceived family-contact quality and marital status were associated with distinct loneliness dimensions. Assessments should consider older adults’ experience of close relationships alongside contact frequency and structural indicators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14193165
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Dimensions of Loneliness Among Older Adults in Osijek-Baranja County: Associations with Sociodemographic, Family, and Social Characteristics

Željko Mudri, Marija Barišić, Ivana Barać, Marin Mamić et al.
Healthcare
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Dimensions of Loneliness Among Older Adults in Osijek-Baranja County: Associations with Sociodemographic, Family, and Social Characteristics

Željko Mudri, Marija Barišić, Ivana Barać, Marin Mamić, Nikolina Farčić, Monika Krpan Feher
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Loneliness among older adults is a public health concern associated with adverse health and well-being outcomes, yet evidence from eastern Croatia remains limited. This study examined social loneliness, family loneliness, and loneliness in romantic relationships among adults aged ≥65 years and their associations with sociodemographic, family, and social characteristics. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 431 community-dwelling older adults in Osijek-Baranja County from January to April 2025. Loneliness was assessed using the Croatian adaptation of the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale. Group differences and correlations were examined using nonparametric methods, followed by separate multiple linear regression models with HC3 robust standard errors. Results: Median scores were 38 (29–47) for social loneliness, 20 (14–29) for family loneliness, and 41 (27–50) for loneliness in romantic relationships. Poorer perceived family-contact quality was associated with higher social and family loneliness in the adjusted models. Compared with good-quality contact, poor-quality contact was associated with social- and family-loneliness scores that were 19.66 and 25.52 points higher, respectively (both p < 0.001). Men and suburban residents had higher social loneliness in bivariate analyses, but sex and residence were not significant in the adjusted model. After adjustment for age, never-married, divorced, and widowed participants had romantic-loneliness scores 14.66, 21.55, and 15.58 points higher than married participants, respectively (all p < 0.001). Older age was weakly and positively correlated with social loneliness (ρ = 0.148; p = 0.002) and loneliness in romantic relationships (ρ = 0.194; p < 0.001). Family-contact frequency was not significant overall in the adjusted social and family loneliness models. Conclusions: Perceived family-contact quality and marital status were associated with distinct loneliness dimensions. Assessments should consider older adults’ experience of close relationships alongside contact frequency and structural indicators.

HealthcareVol. 14(19)
Klinički bolnički centar Osijek (HR), Polytecnic in Požega (HR), University of Osijek (HR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.