Validation of EarthCARE CPR reflectivity using the ACTRIS cloud radar network

The Earth Cloud, Aerosol, and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) satellite carries a cloud profiling radar (CPR) designed to observe global cloud properties. In this study, we assess the calibration of CPR reflectivity profiles by comparing them with seven calibrated ground-based cloud radars from the European Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS). We compare the statistics of ice cloud reflectivities observed from space and from each ground site. The CPR dataset includes all observations within a 200 km radius of each site, while the ground-based dataset comprises vertical profiles collected during the same time period. For this study, the CPR and ACTRIS data were compared on a period spanning from July 2024 to November 2025. By analysing the differences in reflectivity statistics, we estimate the calibration bias between CPR and each site. To ensure robustness, we implement a method to select height bins with comparable reflectivity statistics, excluding uncorrelated observations that could contaminate the results. The reliability of our bias estimates is validated through closure: each ground radar has been calibrated using the same reference, and the independently derived space-versus-ground biases obtained across sites are consistent. Our methodology also provides uncertainty estimates for the reflectivity biases and explores the time sampling required for reliable comparisons. Based on the comparisons from the seven ground-sites, we find that the bias in the EarthCARE L2a reflectivity product is of -0.2±0.4 dB, confirming the high quality of the satellite's calibration. This robust statistical approach, validated with calibrated radars, establishes EarthCARE as a potential reference for calibrating ACTRIS and other ground-based sites in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-6075-2026
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Validation of EarthCARE CPR reflectivity using the ACTRIS cloud radar network

Lukas Pfitzenmaier, Felipe Toledo, Julien Delanoe͏̈, Martial Haeffelin et al.
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
article

Validation of EarthCARE CPR reflectivity using the ACTRIS cloud radar network

Lukas Pfitzenmaier, Felipe Toledo, Julien Delanoe͏̈, Martial Haeffelin, Jean-François Ribaud, Nathan Feuillard, Jean-Charles Dupont
article en

Abstract

The Earth Cloud, Aerosol, and Radiation Explorer (EarthCARE) satellite carries a cloud profiling radar (CPR) designed to observe global cloud properties. In this study, we assess the calibration of CPR reflectivity profiles by comparing them with seven calibrated ground-based cloud radars from the European Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS). We compare the statistics of ice cloud reflectivities observed from space and from each ground site. The CPR dataset includes all observations within a 200 km radius of each site, while the ground-based dataset comprises vertical profiles collected during the same time period. For this study, the CPR and ACTRIS data were compared on a period spanning from July 2024 to November 2025. By analysing the differences in reflectivity statistics, we estimate the calibration bias between CPR and each site. To ensure robustness, we implement a method to select height bins with comparable reflectivity statistics, excluding uncorrelated observations that could contaminate the results. The reliability of our bias estimates is validated through closure: each ground radar has been calibrated using the same reference, and the independently derived space-versus-ground biases obtained across sites are consistent. Our methodology also provides uncertainty estimates for the reflectivity biases and explores the time sampling required for reliable comparisons. Based on the comparisons from the seven ground-sites, we find that the bias in the EarthCARE L2a reflectivity product is of -0.2±0.4 dB, confirming the high quality of the satellite's calibration. This robust statistical approach, validated with calibrated radars, establishes EarthCARE as a potential reference for calibrating ACTRIS and other ground-based sites in the future.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 19(18)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Polytechnique (FR), University of Cologne (DE), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (CNRST) (MA), Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (FR), Laboratoire atmosphères, milieux, observations spatiales (FR), Observatoire des sciences de l'univers de l'Université Versailles Saint-Quentin (FR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.