Live and learn: Student pharmacists' perceptions of a pharmacy resident led NAPLEX® prep bootcamp

Background Amid declining NAPLEX® pass rates, a resident-led, low-resource preparatory bootcamp was implemented to support fourth-year pharmacy students through flexible, student-centered sessions. Impact Students were asked to complete a pre-survey ( n = 26) and post-survey ( n = 9). Student confidence in study skills, learning preferences, study schedules, and accountability remained unchanged or decreased following the bootcamp, with low confidence reported in students' ability to pass the NAPLEX® at both time points. Limited participation hindered outcome interpretation. Recommendations Recommendations for future efforts include enhancing program features, considering the impact of concurrent NAPLEX®-related programming, and pairing survey data. Discussion Despite unknown impacts on student confidence and preparedness, incorporating residents from a teaching and learning curriculum may serve as a feasible resource for implementing NAPLEX® preparation initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2026.102800
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Live and learn: Student pharmacists' perceptions of a pharmacy resident led NAPLEX® prep bootcamp

Margaret de Voest, Emily Berens, Hollyann Holmquist, J.M. Santana et al.
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Live and learn: Student pharmacists' perceptions of a pharmacy resident led NAPLEX® prep bootcamp

Margaret de Voest, Emily Berens, Hollyann Holmquist, J.M. Santana, Kari Vavra Janes
article en

Abstract

Background Amid declining NAPLEX® pass rates, a resident-led, low-resource preparatory bootcamp was implemented to support fourth-year pharmacy students through flexible, student-centered sessions. Impact Students were asked to complete a pre-survey ( n = 26) and post-survey ( n = 9). Student confidence in study skills, learning preferences, study schedules, and accountability remained unchanged or decreased following the bootcamp, with low confidence reported in students' ability to pass the NAPLEX® at both time points. Limited participation hindered outcome interpretation. Recommendations Recommendations for future efforts include enhancing program features, considering the impact of concurrent NAPLEX®-related programming, and pairing survey data. Discussion Despite unknown impacts on student confidence and preparedness, incorporating residents from a teaching and learning curriculum may serve as a feasible resource for implementing NAPLEX® preparation initiatives.

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and LearningVol. 18(12)
Trinity Health (US), Ferris State University (US), Bronson Battle Creek Hospital (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Live and learn: Student pharmacists' perceptions of a pharmacy resident led NAPLEX® prep bootcamp — Margaret de Voest, Emily Berens, et al. · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS