Multistage NMPC with model-error model

This paper proposes and evaluates new schemes for robust nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) in the presence of unstructured (non-parametric) model uncertainty. The approach builds on the concept of model-error models (MEM) which bound the possible dynamics of the error between the nominal model and the real system. The MEM are integrated into multi-stage NMPC formulations. Among the various robust NMPC schemes, multi-stage NMPC achieves a low degree of conservatism by incorporating future reactions of the controller when new measurements become available in its predictions using a scenario tree with recourse variables. The scenario tree describes a set of possible behaviours of the plant, usually by assuming different (e.g., minimum, maximum, nominal) values of some parameters of the plant model. However, in reality there is always unstructured plant-model mismatch due to, for example unmodelled dynamics or simplified model equations. The existing robust NMPC schemes handle structural plant-model mismatch only by embedding it in additive uncorrelated disturbances. It has been shown in linear control theory that dynamic MEM can significantly reduce the conservatism of roust control formulations. Here the scenario tree is constructed using the nominal model and the MEM to represent the non-parametric dynamic plant-model mismatch. The resulting computational burden of the multi-stage approach is reduced by introducing two different simplified formulations, constraint tightened multi-stage NMPC with MEM and tube-enhanced multi-stage NMPC with MEM. The proposed schemes are evaluated using examples from the chemical engineering field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Process Control
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2026.103846
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multistage NMPC with model-error model

S. Engell, S. Thangavel
Journal of Process Control
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
article

Multistage NMPC with model-error model

S. Engell, S. Thangavel
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes and evaluates new schemes for robust nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) in the presence of unstructured (non-parametric) model uncertainty. The approach builds on the concept of model-error models (MEM) which bound the possible dynamics of the error between the nominal model and the real system. The MEM are integrated into multi-stage NMPC formulations. Among the various robust NMPC schemes, multi-stage NMPC achieves a low degree of conservatism by incorporating future reactions of the controller when new measurements become available in its predictions using a scenario tree with recourse variables. The scenario tree describes a set of possible behaviours of the plant, usually by assuming different (e.g., minimum, maximum, nominal) values of some parameters of the plant model. However, in reality there is always unstructured plant-model mismatch due to, for example unmodelled dynamics or simplified model equations. The existing robust NMPC schemes handle structural plant-model mismatch only by embedding it in additive uncorrelated disturbances. It has been shown in linear control theory that dynamic MEM can significantly reduce the conservatism of roust control formulations. Here the scenario tree is constructed using the nominal model and the MEM to represent the non-parametric dynamic plant-model mismatch. The resulting computational burden of the multi-stage approach is reduced by introducing two different simplified formulations, constraint tightened multi-stage NMPC with MEM and tube-enhanced multi-stage NMPC with MEM. The proposed schemes are evaluated using examples from the chemical engineering field.

Journal of Process ControlVol. 167
TU Dortmund University (DE), Ineos (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.