Evaluation of Latent and Active Tuberculosis Development in Patients Receiving Biologic Agent Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis

ObjectiveTo determine the incidence of active TB in patients re-ceiving biological/tsDMARD therapy and to examinethe effects of LTBI prophylaxis and the level of immu-nosuppression on risk.Material and MethodPatients aged ≥18 years who started biological treat-ment between 2019 and 2024 were reviewed retro-spectively. Inclusion criteria: ≥3 months of biological/tsDMARD use, at least one LTBI test (PPD or IGRA)performed before the treatment, and ≥6 months of fol-low-up records. Exclusions: previous active TB, miss-ing baseline data, or follow-up at an external center.Demographics, diagnosis, agent type/duration, addi-tional immunosuppression, BCG scar, LTBI screeningresults, prophylaxis regimen, and adverse events wererecorded. The primary endpoint was defined as activeTB. The relationship between LTBI treatment, levelof immunosuppression, LTBI positivity, and active TBwas examined using Bayesian logistic regression.ResultsA total of 101 patients were reviewed. PPD was per-formed in 69.1% and IGRA in 51.5% of patients; BCGscar was observed in 93.8%. Two cases of active TB(2.0%) were observed: one developed under barici-tinib and the other under bevacizumab. The LTBI pro-phylaxis completion rate was 71.2%, and hepatotox-icity was 11.9%. Bayesian analysis revealed a highbut uncertain risk association with LTBI treatment (OR57.65; 95% CrI 0.93-3303.16), which was consistentwith indication confounding. The likelihood of higherrisk was 78% in the low-moderate immunosuppres-sion group. No independent effect of LTBI positivitywas observed.ConclusionActive TB under biological/tsDMARD therapy is rarebut important. The high risk seen in those receivingLTBI prophylaxis may be a result of clinicians select-ing high-risk patients rather than the treatment itself.The findings achieved in this study suggest that cau-tion is necessary with JAK inhibitors and anti-angio-genic agents and should be confirmed by larger pro-spective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17343/sdutfd.1846547
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluation of Latent and Active Tuberculosis Development in Patients Receiving Biologic Agent Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis

Işıl Deniz Aliravci, Pınar Mutlu
SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

Evaluation of Latent and Active Tuberculosis Development in Patients Receiving Biologic Agent Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis

Işıl Deniz Aliravci, Pınar Mutlu
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the incidence of active TB in patients re-ceiving biological/tsDMARD therapy and to examinethe effects of LTBI prophylaxis and the level of immu-nosuppression on risk.Material and MethodPatients aged ≥18 years who started biological treat-ment between 2019 and 2024 were reviewed retro-spectively. Inclusion criteria: ≥3 months of biological/tsDMARD use, at least one LTBI test (PPD or IGRA)performed before the treatment, and ≥6 months of fol-low-up records. Exclusions: previous active TB, miss-ing baseline data, or follow-up at an external center.Demographics, diagnosis, agent type/duration, addi-tional immunosuppression, BCG scar, LTBI screeningresults, prophylaxis regimen, and adverse events wererecorded. The primary endpoint was defined as activeTB. The relationship between LTBI treatment, levelof immunosuppression, LTBI positivity, and active TBwas examined using Bayesian logistic regression.ResultsA total of 101 patients were reviewed. PPD was per-formed in 69.1% and IGRA in 51.5% of patients; BCGscar was observed in 93.8%. Two cases of active TB(2.0%) were observed: one developed under barici-tinib and the other under bevacizumab. The LTBI pro-phylaxis completion rate was 71.2%, and hepatotox-icity was 11.9%. Bayesian analysis revealed a highbut uncertain risk association with LTBI treatment (OR57.65; 95% CrI 0.93-3303.16), which was consistentwith indication confounding. The likelihood of higherrisk was 78% in the low-moderate immunosuppres-sion group. No independent effect of LTBI positivitywas observed.ConclusionActive TB under biological/tsDMARD therapy is rarebut important. The high risk seen in those receivingLTBI prophylaxis may be a result of clinicians select-ing high-risk patients rather than the treatment itself.The findings achieved in this study suggest that cau-tion is necessary with JAK inhibitors and anti-angio-genic agents and should be confirmed by larger pro-spective studies.

SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi DergisiVol. 33(3)
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Latent and Active Tuberculosis Development in Patients Receiving Biologic Agent Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis — Işıl Deniz Aliravci, Pınar Mutlu · SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS