Operationalizing fear of cancer recurrence care: a modified Delphi study establishing a consensus-based clinical pathway for Danish cancer survivors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a prevalent concern among cancer survivors. Although evidence-based FCR guidelines exist, their implementation requires further operationalization. This study aimed to establish expert consensus on a clinical pathway to operationalize guideline-concordant FCR care in Denmark. Patient/material and methods: A modified Delphi study was conducted, comprising Round 0 and three Delphi rounds. In Round 1, 112 experts were invited, and 80 participated (71%) in an online survey rating proposed pathway statements. Twenty-seven participants attended a consensus workshop (Round 2) to discuss and refine statements not reaching consensus in Round 1. In Round 3, 71 participants (63%) re-rated the revised statements from Round 2. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 10 statements in Round 1 and 6 revised or newly formulated statements in Round 3, including systematic screening of all cancer survivors with validated tools using a two-step approach, and initiation of screening at transition from treatment to follow-up. Consensus was achieved for need-based assessment guided by symptom severity and patient-expressed need. A matched-care model, aligning treatment intensity with FCR severity, achieved consensus in Round 1. Ongoing monitoring through re-screening during follow-up and post-intervention was endorsed. Timing of assessment and the management of FCR treatment non-response did not reach consensus. INTERPRETATION: This Delphi study provides a consensus-based clinical pathway for FCR, including systematic screening, needs-based assessment, and matched-care allocation. The findings address key implementation gaps in existing FCR guidelines and offer a structured framework for integrating FCR care into routine practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Oncologica
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226x.2026.46444
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Operationalizing fear of cancer recurrence care: a modified Delphi study establishing a consensus-based clinical pathway for Danish cancer survivors

Eva Rames Nissen, Lise Ventzel, Matteo Allegretti, Henriette Vind Thaysen et al.
Acta Oncologica
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Operationalizing fear of cancer recurrence care: a modified Delphi study establishing a consensus-based clinical pathway for Danish cancer survivors

Eva Rames Nissen, Lise Ventzel, Matteo Allegretti, Henriette Vind Thaysen, Iben Husted Nielsen, Lars Henrik Jensen, Anders Bonde Jensen, Laura Sandholdt Jensen, Christina Maar Andersen, Eriseld Krasniqi, Brigitta Rasmussen Villumsen, Pernille Bech, Emma Skov Rahbæk, Anne Katrine Hartmann Søby, Thea Otto Mattsson, Johanne Dam Lyhne, Ulrike Johansen, Anne Johansen, Frederik Lynge Overgaard, Allan 'Ben' Smith
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a prevalent concern among cancer survivors. Although evidence-based FCR guidelines exist, their implementation requires further operationalization. This study aimed to establish expert consensus on a clinical pathway to operationalize guideline-concordant FCR care in Denmark. Patient/material and methods: A modified Delphi study was conducted, comprising Round 0 and three Delphi rounds. In Round 1, 112 experts were invited, and 80 participated (71%) in an online survey rating proposed pathway statements. Twenty-seven participants attended a consensus workshop (Round 2) to discuss and refine statements not reaching consensus in Round 1. In Round 3, 71 participants (63%) re-rated the revised statements from Round 2. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved for 10 statements in Round 1 and 6 revised or newly formulated statements in Round 3, including systematic screening of all cancer survivors with validated tools using a two-step approach, and initiation of screening at transition from treatment to follow-up. Consensus was achieved for need-based assessment guided by symptom severity and patient-expressed need. A matched-care model, aligning treatment intensity with FCR severity, achieved consensus in Round 1. Ongoing monitoring through re-screening during follow-up and post-intervention was endorsed. Timing of assessment and the management of FCR treatment non-response did not reach consensus. INTERPRETATION: This Delphi study provides a consensus-based clinical pathway for FCR, including systematic screening, needs-based assessment, and matched-care allocation. The findings address key implementation gaps in existing FCR guidelines and offer a structured framework for integrating FCR care into routine practice.

Acta OncologicaVol. 65
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Vejle Sygehus (DK), Region of Southern Denmark (DK), National Cancer Institute (MY), Aalborg University (DK), Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.