Camouflaging and self-esteem in neurodivergent women: A cross-sectional comparison across autism, ADHD, and dual diagnosis

Background Camouflaging of neurodivergent traits is increasingly recognized as a strategy used by women with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), yet comparative evidence across diagnostic groups remains limited. Objectives This study examined camouflaging levels and self-esteem in adult women with ASD, ADHD, dual diagnosis (ASD+ADHD), and those undergoing diagnostic assessment. We also explored associations between camouflaging subscales and self-esteem and examined the role of sociodemographic factors. Methods A total of 155 adult women (M = 33.9 years, SD = 9.15) completed an online survey including the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and a Polish-language translation of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire (CAT-Q). Participants were recruited via social media support communities in Poland. Groups comprised women with self-reported diagnoses of ASD (n = 39), ADHD (n = 42), dual diagnosis (n = 45), and those in the diagnostic process (n = 29). Results Women with ASD and dual diagnosis reported significantly higher overall camouflaging, compensation, and assimilation scores than women with ADHD. No significant differences emerged between diagnosed women and those undergoing assessment. Self-esteem was negatively associated with overall camouflaging (r = −.29, p < .001) and most strongly with assimilation (r = −.45, p < .001); compensation showed no significant association. Descriptively, the strongest associations were observed in the dual diagnosis group. In exploratory analyses, older age and motherhood were associated with lower camouflaging; the association with motherhood remained significant after adjustment for age, although this finding should be interpreted with caution. The Polish CAT-Q demonstrated good internal consistency in this sample (α =.72–.90); full psychometric validation remains to be completed. Conclusions Assimilation strategies showed the strongest negative association with self-esteem in neurodivergent women. In descriptive terms, women with dual diagnosis reported the highest levels of camouflaging, although they did not differ significantly from women with ASD alone. Diagnosed women did not differ from women undergoing diagnostic assessment in camouflaging or self-esteem, suggesting that diagnostic status alone was not associated with these outcomes; post-diagnostic support focused on reducing camouflaging pressure and building self-acceptance may therefore be warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Autism
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reia.2026.203023
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Camouflaging and self-esteem in neurodivergent women: A cross-sectional comparison across autism, ADHD, and dual diagnosis

Magdalena Kobylarczyk
Research in Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Camouflaging and self-esteem in neurodivergent women: A cross-sectional comparison across autism, ADHD, and dual diagnosis

Magdalena Kobylarczyk
article en

Abstract

Background Camouflaging of neurodivergent traits is increasingly recognized as a strategy used by women with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), yet comparative evidence across diagnostic groups remains limited. Objectives This study examined camouflaging levels and self-esteem in adult women with ASD, ADHD, dual diagnosis (ASD+ADHD), and those undergoing diagnostic assessment. We also explored associations between camouflaging subscales and self-esteem and examined the role of sociodemographic factors. Methods A total of 155 adult women (M = 33.9 years, SD = 9.15) completed an online survey including the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and a Polish-language translation of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire (CAT-Q). Participants were recruited via social media support communities in Poland. Groups comprised women with self-reported diagnoses of ASD (n = 39), ADHD (n = 42), dual diagnosis (n = 45), and those in the diagnostic process (n = 29). Results Women with ASD and dual diagnosis reported significantly higher overall camouflaging, compensation, and assimilation scores than women with ADHD. No significant differences emerged between diagnosed women and those undergoing assessment. Self-esteem was negatively associated with overall camouflaging (r = −.29, p < .001) and most strongly with assimilation (r = −.45, p < .001); compensation showed no significant association. Descriptively, the strongest associations were observed in the dual diagnosis group. In exploratory analyses, older age and motherhood were associated with lower camouflaging; the association with motherhood remained significant after adjustment for age, although this finding should be interpreted with caution. The Polish CAT-Q demonstrated good internal consistency in this sample (α =.72–.90); full psychometric validation remains to be completed. Conclusions Assimilation strategies showed the strongest negative association with self-esteem in neurodivergent women. In descriptive terms, women with dual diagnosis reported the highest levels of camouflaging, although they did not differ significantly from women with ASD alone. Diagnosed women did not differ from women undergoing diagnostic assessment in camouflaging or self-esteem, suggesting that diagnostic status alone was not associated with these outcomes; post-diagnostic support focused on reducing camouflaging pressure and building self-acceptance may therefore be warranted.

Research in AutismVol. 138
University of Łódź (PL), Institute of Psychology (PL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.