Which senses do wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) use to evaluate potential food?

Abstract Traditionally, primates have been considered primarily visual animals. However, studies across a variety of taxa suggest that, in the context of food evaluation, reliance on this sense might be more nuanced that previously thought, with dietary specialization and food item properties leading to differences in sensory prioritization. We assessed the use of sensory cues during food evaluation and food-related behaviors such as muzzle contact in two mixed-sex groups of wild vervet monkeys ( Chrorocebus pygerythrus ) over 5 months (N monkeys = 44). Using 18,868 food evaluation observations collected during 44 hr of focal samples, we found that vervets mainly used their sense of vision when evaluating food (96.8% of all instances). However, the relative usage of each sense varied with food category, and we observed that males used smell for bark inspection more frequently than females. We also found that juveniles used tactile inspection more often than adults. Performance of most food-related behaviors investigated (preparation and rejection) differed significantly according to food type but not between age classes or sexes. In addition, juveniles initiated muzzle contact more often than adults and females received muzzle contact more often than males did. We found overall low rejection rates of food items, suggesting that most food items were familiar to the vervets regardless of age and sex. These findings are in line with optimal foraging theory, according to which the food evaluation process should be adapted to the familiarity of food items, allowing individuals to maximize their intake of energy and critical nutrients, while minimizing the time and effort spent in food evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Primatology
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-026-00584-9
Primary Topic
Primate Behavior and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Which senses do wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) use to evaluate potential food?

Alba Motes‐Rodrigo, Matthias Laska, Erica van de Waal, Clara Ondina Ferreira da Silva Teixeira
International Journal of Primatology
Primate Behavior and Ecology
article

Which senses do wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) use to evaluate potential food?

Alba Motes‐Rodrigo, Matthias Laska, Erica van de Waal, Clara Ondina Ferreira da Silva Teixeira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Traditionally, primates have been considered primarily visual animals. However, studies across a variety of taxa suggest that, in the context of food evaluation, reliance on this sense might be more nuanced that previously thought, with dietary specialization and food item properties leading to differences in sensory prioritization. We assessed the use of sensory cues during food evaluation and food-related behaviors such as muzzle contact in two mixed-sex groups of wild vervet monkeys ( Chrorocebus pygerythrus ) over 5 months (N monkeys = 44). Using 18,868 food evaluation observations collected during 44 hr of focal samples, we found that vervets mainly used their sense of vision when evaluating food (96.8% of all instances). However, the relative usage of each sense varied with food category, and we observed that males used smell for bark inspection more frequently than females. We also found that juveniles used tactile inspection more often than adults. Performance of most food-related behaviors investigated (preparation and rejection) differed significantly according to food type but not between age classes or sexes. In addition, juveniles initiated muzzle contact more often than adults and females received muzzle contact more often than males did. We found overall low rejection rates of food items, suggesting that most food items were familiar to the vervets regardless of age and sex. These findings are in line with optimal foraging theory, according to which the food evaluation process should be adapted to the familiarity of food items, allowing individuals to maximize their intake of energy and critical nutrients, while minimizing the time and effort spent in food evaluation.

International Journal of Primatology
Linköping University (SE), The Sense Innovation and Research Center (CH), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA), University of Lausanne (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Primate Behavior and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.