A Novel Approach in Characterising Misogyny

Abstract Misogyny is traditionally understood as hatred against women. Contra this view, Kate Manne (2018) argued that “misogyny” should be defined as a sanction-distributing mechanism that punishes women who violate gender norms and rewards women who comply with them. Here, I argue for a novel approach in characterising “misogyny.” The paper consists of two main parts. In the negative one, I acknowledge the deficiencies of both accounts. Specifically, I focus on the limitations of Manne’s definition. First, I argue that Manne’s reactive reading of misogyny downplays her account’s predictive capacity and aspired extensional scope. Second, I propose that the affective dimension should be given more prominence. Then, I outline the desiderata for an adequate account of “misogyny.” The suggested approach is to integrate the psychological and structural perspectives by (i) incorporating the structural explanation of the phenomenon by definition, and (ii) treating the affective dimension as a core part of misogyny.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hypatia
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2026.10104
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Novel Approach in Characterising Misogyny

Margherita Grassi
Hypatia
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

A Novel Approach in Characterising Misogyny

Margherita Grassi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Misogyny is traditionally understood as hatred against women. Contra this view, Kate Manne (2018) argued that “misogyny” should be defined as a sanction-distributing mechanism that punishes women who violate gender norms and rewards women who comply with them. Here, I argue for a novel approach in characterising “misogyny.” The paper consists of two main parts. In the negative one, I acknowledge the deficiencies of both accounts. Specifically, I focus on the limitations of Manne’s definition. First, I argue that Manne’s reactive reading of misogyny downplays her account’s predictive capacity and aspired extensional scope. Second, I propose that the affective dimension should be given more prominence. Then, I outline the desiderata for an adequate account of “misogyny.” The suggested approach is to integrate the psychological and structural perspectives by (i) incorporating the structural explanation of the phenomenon by definition, and (ii) treating the affective dimension as a core part of misogyny.

Hypatia
Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.