Validation of a Lightweight Unmanned Ground Vehicle Model for Undercarriage and Drive System Dynamic Loads Analysis

The modeling of lightweight unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) with elastomeric tracks presents a challenge due to nonlinear contact mechanics and compliance characteristics that differ significantly from heavy steel-tracked platforms. This study validates a high-fidelity multibody dynamics model of a lightweight tracked UGV, developed in MSC Adams/View, against experimental. For this purpose, the necessary identification tests were also prepared and carried out. The multi-stage validation process utilized the ARAMIS optical measurement system to capture kinematic responses during track belt deflection, motion-resistance tests, and dynamic maneuvers, including acceleration, braking, and obstacle negotiation. The simulations incorporated a segmented track belt model with compliant force elements, calibrated contact parameters, and the full UGV model. The results demonstrated the strong accuracy between numerical models and real objects (track belt and UGV), with a mean relative error (MRE) of 4.16% for track belt deflection and an overall mean MRE of approximately 2.17% for the UGV suspension spring displacements. Following calibration, the simulated motion-resistance force differed by 0.03% from the reference value of 353.4 N. The developed UGV model accurately represents general dynamic behavior. The maximum relative error for the pitch-related angle α1 reached 11.99% during transient motion. This could be caused by geometric simplifications and longitudinal track belt stiffness estimation. The study demonstrates that the model provides a credible representation of the global undercarriage dynamics within the investigated operating conditions and may serve as a basis for subsequent analyses of undercarriage and drivetrain loads, while short-duration peak loads should be interpreted with caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16199490
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Validation of a Lightweight Unmanned Ground Vehicle Model for Undercarriage and Drive System Dynamic Loads Analysis

Lucjan Śnieżek, Dawid Tomica, Piotr Krogul, Arkadiusz Rubiec et al.
Applied Sciences
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
article

Validation of a Lightweight Unmanned Ground Vehicle Model for Undercarriage and Drive System Dynamic Loads Analysis

Lucjan Śnieżek, Dawid Tomica, Piotr Krogul, Arkadiusz Rubiec, Marcin Dejewski
article en

Abstract

The modeling of lightweight unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) with elastomeric tracks presents a challenge due to nonlinear contact mechanics and compliance characteristics that differ significantly from heavy steel-tracked platforms. This study validates a high-fidelity multibody dynamics model of a lightweight tracked UGV, developed in MSC Adams/View, against experimental. For this purpose, the necessary identification tests were also prepared and carried out. The multi-stage validation process utilized the ARAMIS optical measurement system to capture kinematic responses during track belt deflection, motion-resistance tests, and dynamic maneuvers, including acceleration, braking, and obstacle negotiation. The simulations incorporated a segmented track belt model with compliant force elements, calibrated contact parameters, and the full UGV model. The results demonstrated the strong accuracy between numerical models and real objects (track belt and UGV), with a mean relative error (MRE) of 4.16% for track belt deflection and an overall mean MRE of approximately 2.17% for the UGV suspension spring displacements. Following calibration, the simulated motion-resistance force differed by 0.03% from the reference value of 353.4 N. The developed UGV model accurately represents general dynamic behavior. The maximum relative error for the pitch-related angle α1 reached 11.99% during transient motion. This could be caused by geometric simplifications and longitudinal track belt stiffness estimation. The study demonstrates that the model provides a credible representation of the global undercarriage dynamics within the investigated operating conditions and may serve as a basis for subsequent analyses of undercarriage and drivetrain loads, while short-duration peak loads should be interpreted with caution.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(19)
Military University of Technology in Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.