Analysis of clinical investigation (device) initial submissions received by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency between January 2022 and December 2025

Aims This study aimed to analyse clinical investigation‐device initial submissions received by the MHRA between January 2022 and December 2025. Methods Data on submissions were extracted from the clinical investigations unit data bank; software as medical devices were not included. The predefined primary end‐point was submission type. Secondary end‐points were sponsor type, participant demographics, healthy volunteers, health categories and studies involving first‐in‐human. The analysis used descriptive statistics for all categorical variables. Results The MHRA received 322 valid submissions; 60.3% were United Kingdom only, and the remainder were also conducted in 39 countries. Multi‐country submissions included locations in Europe, North and South America, Asia and Australia. Submissions increased by 5% between 2024 and 2025. Pivotal studies were the most common (47.5%), while post‐market studies were the least common (0.3%). Commercial investigations accounted for 67.4%. Non‐commercial sponsors were highest in feasibility studies (56.2%); commercial in pivotal studies (54.4%). The population demographics across all studies involving both sexes were 91%, 6.5% female only, 2.5% male only and 5.6% pregnant women. Adolescents were the most represented paediatric group (10.6%), while in utero was rare (0.3%). Only one first‐in‐human study involved pregnant women. Across demographics, pivotal studies were highest in paediatric and in utero (51.1%). The three main health categories included in the submission were cardiovascular (16.5%), ophthalmology (10.9%) and respiratory (9.3%). Conclusions Results highlight the UK clinical investigations landscape and provide an important baseline for patients, policymakers, healthcare providers, manufacturers and sponsors, enabling an assessment of how policy changes can increase the variety and number of clinical investigations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70830
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Analysis of clinical investigation (device) initial submissions received by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency between January 2022 and December 2025

Crina Cacou, Andrea Manfrin, Graham Warren, Alejandro F. Frangi et al.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Analysis of clinical investigation (device) initial submissions received by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency between January 2022 and December 2025

Crina Cacou, Andrea Manfrin, Graham Warren, Alejandro F. Frangi, Daniel Hill, Jacob George, James Pound, Mark Grumbridge
article en

Abstract

Aims This study aimed to analyse clinical investigation‐device initial submissions received by the MHRA between January 2022 and December 2025. Methods Data on submissions were extracted from the clinical investigations unit data bank; software as medical devices were not included. The predefined primary end‐point was submission type. Secondary end‐points were sponsor type, participant demographics, healthy volunteers, health categories and studies involving first‐in‐human. The analysis used descriptive statistics for all categorical variables. Results The MHRA received 322 valid submissions; 60.3% were United Kingdom only, and the remainder were also conducted in 39 countries. Multi‐country submissions included locations in Europe, North and South America, Asia and Australia. Submissions increased by 5% between 2024 and 2025. Pivotal studies were the most common (47.5%), while post‐market studies were the least common (0.3%). Commercial investigations accounted for 67.4%. Non‐commercial sponsors were highest in feasibility studies (56.2%); commercial in pivotal studies (54.4%). The population demographics across all studies involving both sexes were 91%, 6.5% female only, 2.5% male only and 5.6% pregnant women. Adolescents were the most represented paediatric group (10.6%), while in utero was rare (0.3%). Only one first‐in‐human study involved pregnant women. Across demographics, pivotal studies were highest in paediatric and in utero (51.1%). The three main health categories included in the submission were cardiovascular (16.5%), ophthalmology (10.9%) and respiratory (9.3%). Conclusions Results highlight the UK clinical investigations landscape and provide an important baseline for patients, policymakers, healthcare providers, manufacturers and sponsors, enabling an assessment of how policy changes can increase the variety and number of clinical investigations.

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.