The QOLA study: psychometric validation of the Quality of Life of Parents of Children with Achondroplasia (QOLA) questionnaire - a multinational study in Germany, Italy, and Portugal

Abstract Background Parents of children with achondroplasia experience multidimensional impacts on quality of life (QoL), yet validated condition-specific instruments for assessing these outcomes across countries are scarce. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life of Parents of Children with Achondroplasia (QOLA) questionnaire in three European settings. Methods A multinational, multicentre observational psychometric validation study was conducted in Germany, Italy, and Portugal. Parents/primary caregivers ( N = 149) completed the 43-item QOLA (eight conceptual domains) and the EUROHIS-QOL-8 at baseline (T1); a subsample completed follow-up assessments (T2; n = 77) for test–retest analyses. Data quality (missingness, floor/ceiling effects), internal consistency (Cronbach’s α; composite reliability), temporal stability (Pearson correlations; intraclass correlation coefficients), and convergent validity (correlations with EUROHIS-QOL-8) were examined. Exploratory factor analysis informed item reduction and domain aggregation, followed by confirmatory factor analysis of the reduced model. Results Item-level missingness was minimal, and no substantial floor/ceiling effects were observed. Eight-domain scores showed acceptable to excellent internal consistency (α = 0.706–0.905) and moderate-to-good temporal stability (single-measure ICCs = 0.64–0.75). Convergent validity was supported by negative associations between QOLA domains and generic QoL ( r = .15–0.69). Exploratory and confirmatory analyses supported a parsimonious three-factor, 20-item model, comprising Healthcare System Trust, Caregiving Burden and Daily Impact, and Worries About the Future and Social Relationships, with acceptable fit (CFI = 0.935, TLI = 0.925, RMSEA = 0.066), strong reliability (α = 0.852–0.918; CR = 0.864–0.914), and good test–retest stability ( r = .670–0.782; average-measure ICCs = 0.801–0.877). Conclusions The QOLA demonstrates robust reliability and validity across three countries and offers both an eight-domain profile and a three-factor summary for assessing parental QoL in achondroplasia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2026-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01207-w
Primary Topic
Connective tissue disorders research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The QOLA study: psychometric validation of the Quality of Life of Parents of Children with Achondroplasia (QOLA) questionnaire - a multinational study in Germany, Italy, and Portugal

Adekunle Adedeji, Klaus L. Mohnike, Stefanie Witt, Marco Sessa et al.
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Connective tissue disorders research
article

The QOLA study: psychometric validation of the Quality of Life of Parents of Children with Achondroplasia (QOLA) questionnaire - a multinational study in Germany, Italy, and Portugal

Adekunle Adedeji, Klaus L. Mohnike, Stefanie Witt, Marco Sessa, Julia Quitmann, Florian Innig, Chiara Provasi, Maria Salomão, Inês Alves, Lea Maric
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Parents of children with achondroplasia experience multidimensional impacts on quality of life (QoL), yet validated condition-specific instruments for assessing these outcomes across countries are scarce. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life of Parents of Children with Achondroplasia (QOLA) questionnaire in three European settings. Methods A multinational, multicentre observational psychometric validation study was conducted in Germany, Italy, and Portugal. Parents/primary caregivers ( N = 149) completed the 43-item QOLA (eight conceptual domains) and the EUROHIS-QOL-8 at baseline (T1); a subsample completed follow-up assessments (T2; n = 77) for test–retest analyses. Data quality (missingness, floor/ceiling effects), internal consistency (Cronbach’s α; composite reliability), temporal stability (Pearson correlations; intraclass correlation coefficients), and convergent validity (correlations with EUROHIS-QOL-8) were examined. Exploratory factor analysis informed item reduction and domain aggregation, followed by confirmatory factor analysis of the reduced model. Results Item-level missingness was minimal, and no substantial floor/ceiling effects were observed. Eight-domain scores showed acceptable to excellent internal consistency (α = 0.706–0.905) and moderate-to-good temporal stability (single-measure ICCs = 0.64–0.75). Convergent validity was supported by negative associations between QOLA domains and generic QoL ( r = .15–0.69). Exploratory and confirmatory analyses supported a parsimonious three-factor, 20-item model, comprising Healthcare System Trust, Caregiving Burden and Daily Impact, and Worries About the Future and Social Relationships, with acceptable fit (CFI = 0.935, TLI = 0.925, RMSEA = 0.066), strong reliability (α = 0.852–0.918; CR = 0.864–0.914), and good test–retest stability ( r = .670–0.782; average-measure ICCs = 0.801–0.877). Conclusions The QOLA demonstrates robust reliability and validity across three countries and offers both an eight-domain profile and a three-factor summary for assessing parental QoL in achondroplasia.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Connective tissue disorders research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.