Uncertainty, risk drivers and return–volatility transmission in Indian banks

Purpose This study seeks to analyse the return and volatility connectedness between public- and private-sector banks in India. Furthermore, it investigates the influence of uncertainty and risk factors on this connectedness. Design/methodology/approach This study used the daily closing prices of 10 public and 7 private-sector banks from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2024, sourced from investing.com. The time-varying parameter vector autoregression model is applied to analyse return and volatility connectedness, while ordinary least squares and quantile regression are employed to examine the impact of risk and uncertainty factors. Findings The study's findings indicate that return spillovers exceed volatility spillovers. Further study results reveal that the State Bank of India (SBI) is a significant transmitter of return spillover, whereas City Union Bank acts as a lower transmitter and receiver. Additionally, the results show that Punjab National Bank is a larger transmitter of volatility spillover, while City Union Bank is the least active in this regard. Furthermore, the findings suggest that Domestic Economic Policy Uncertainty Index, Environmental, Social and Governance Uncertainty Index, Geopolitical Risk Index, Oil Price Uncertainty Index and the CBOE Volatility Index have a positive and significant influence on return connectedness, whereas Global Economic Policy Uncertainty Index has a negative effect. Practical implications The study's findings will help investors, managers and policymakers by highlighting cross-bank spillovers, enabling the development of hedging strategies, facilitating systemic risk monitoring and informing targeted regulatory interventions to strengthen portfolio construction and financial stability. Originality/value This study is the first to investigate the time-varying return and volatility connectedness between public- and private-sector banks in India. Unlike prior studies, it incorporates risk and uncertainty factors to uncover their asymmetric and quantile-dependent effects on systemic transmission dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-12-2025-0933
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Uncertainty, risk drivers and return–volatility transmission in Indian banks

Devinder Sharma, Satish Kumar
Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Uncertainty, risk drivers and return–volatility transmission in Indian banks

Devinder Sharma, Satish Kumar
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study seeks to analyse the return and volatility connectedness between public- and private-sector banks in India. Furthermore, it investigates the influence of uncertainty and risk factors on this connectedness. Design/methodology/approach This study used the daily closing prices of 10 public and 7 private-sector banks from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2024, sourced from investing.com. The time-varying parameter vector autoregression model is applied to analyse return and volatility connectedness, while ordinary least squares and quantile regression are employed to examine the impact of risk and uncertainty factors. Findings The study's findings indicate that return spillovers exceed volatility spillovers. Further study results reveal that the State Bank of India (SBI) is a significant transmitter of return spillover, whereas City Union Bank acts as a lower transmitter and receiver. Additionally, the results show that Punjab National Bank is a larger transmitter of volatility spillover, while City Union Bank is the least active in this regard. Furthermore, the findings suggest that Domestic Economic Policy Uncertainty Index, Environmental, Social and Governance Uncertainty Index, Geopolitical Risk Index, Oil Price Uncertainty Index and the CBOE Volatility Index have a positive and significant influence on return connectedness, whereas Global Economic Policy Uncertainty Index has a negative effect. Practical implications The study's findings will help investors, managers and policymakers by highlighting cross-bank spillovers, enabling the development of hedging strategies, facilitating systemic risk monitoring and informing targeted regulatory interventions to strengthen portfolio construction and financial stability. Originality/value This study is the first to investigate the time-varying return and volatility connectedness between public- and private-sector banks in India. Unlike prior studies, it incorporates risk and uncertainty factors to uncover their asymmetric and quantile-dependent effects on systemic transmission dynamics.

Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Himachal Pradesh University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uncertainty, risk drivers and return–volatility transmission in Indian banks — Devinder Sharma, Satish Kumar · Journal of economic and administrative sciences. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS