A Major Review of Fungal Lacrimal Drainage Infections

Purpose: Lacrimal system infections, such as canaliculitis and dacryocystitis, are usually of bacterial etiology. We present a review of fungal lacrimal drainage infections. Methods: A literature review was conducted using Medline and Embase databases following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were synthesized narratively. Data obtained include demographics, clinical presentation, types of fungal infection, location of the infection, investigations, medical and surgical treatment (acute and delayed), and symptom resolution. Results: A total of 118 cases of fungal lacrimal infections have been reported so far. The most commonly reported species were Candida (27.1%) and Aspergillus (23.7%). The majority [74.6% (88/118)] involved the lacrimal sac and the nasolacrimal duct. Of these, 42.0% (37/88) had concurrent casts or dacryoliths. A total of 14.4% (17/118) involved only the canaliculus. Where specified, nearly all patients reported local symptoms of epiphora (77.4%, 24/31). A total of 66.7% (12/18) of patients had risk factors, including immunosuppression, trauma, concurrent fungal infection elsewhere, and lacrimal sac diverticulum. Where specified, all cases (56/56) showed improvement or resolution of symptoms. Of these, 66.1% (37/56) required only medical or conservative management. Conclusion: Fungal lacrimal infections are uncommon but should be suspected in patients presenting with new epiphora in the context of dacryocystitis, especially in the presence of casts or dacryoliths, while a smaller proportion causes canaliculitis. Diagnosis is challenging, requiring a combination of clinical suspicion, risk factor assessment (eg, immunosuppression), and laboratory confirmation. Treatment approaches range from conservative medical management to surgical interventions. Further research is needed to better understand their pathogenesis, especially regarding their relationship with dacryolith formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Ophthalmology Clinics
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/iio.0000000000000622
Primary Topic
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Major Review of Fungal Lacrimal Drainage Infections

Valerie A. R. Juniat, Mohammad J. Ali
International Ophthalmology Clinics
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments
article

A Major Review of Fungal Lacrimal Drainage Infections

Valerie A. R. Juniat, Mohammad J. Ali
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Lacrimal system infections, such as canaliculitis and dacryocystitis, are usually of bacterial etiology. We present a review of fungal lacrimal drainage infections. Methods: A literature review was conducted using Medline and Embase databases following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were synthesized narratively. Data obtained include demographics, clinical presentation, types of fungal infection, location of the infection, investigations, medical and surgical treatment (acute and delayed), and symptom resolution. Results: A total of 118 cases of fungal lacrimal infections have been reported so far. The most commonly reported species were Candida (27.1%) and Aspergillus (23.7%). The majority [74.6% (88/118)] involved the lacrimal sac and the nasolacrimal duct. Of these, 42.0% (37/88) had concurrent casts or dacryoliths. A total of 14.4% (17/118) involved only the canaliculus. Where specified, nearly all patients reported local symptoms of epiphora (77.4%, 24/31). A total of 66.7% (12/18) of patients had risk factors, including immunosuppression, trauma, concurrent fungal infection elsewhere, and lacrimal sac diverticulum. Where specified, all cases (56/56) showed improvement or resolution of symptoms. Of these, 66.1% (37/56) required only medical or conservative management. Conclusion: Fungal lacrimal infections are uncommon but should be suspected in patients presenting with new epiphora in the context of dacryocystitis, especially in the presence of casts or dacryoliths, while a smaller proportion causes canaliculitis. Diagnosis is challenging, requiring a combination of clinical suspicion, risk factor assessment (eg, immunosuppression), and laboratory confirmation. Treatment approaches range from conservative medical management to surgical interventions. Further research is needed to better understand their pathogenesis, especially regarding their relationship with dacryolith formation.

International Ophthalmology ClinicsVol. 66(4)
L V Prasad Eye Institute (IN), Sussex Eye Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Major Review of Fungal Lacrimal Drainage Infections — Valerie A. R. Juniat, Mohammad J. Ali · International Ophthalmology Clinics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS