Barriers and facilitators of vector-borne diseases knowledge translation: a scoping review

Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) such as leishmaniasis, dengue, and malaria continue to pose major public health challenges, driven by environmental, socioeconomic, and climatic factors. Although numerous studies have generated valuable evidence, research findings are rarely translated into effective policy and practice. This evidence-to-policy gap hinders disease control efforts and leads to wasted resources. Knowledge translation (KT) is critical for bridging this gap. This scoping review maps the barriers and facilitators to KT in VBD control, with particular focus on leishmaniasis, dengue, and malaria. This scoping review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (refined by Levac et al. [1]) and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. English and Persian databases (PubMed, Scopus, MagIran, SID) and grey literature (Google Scholar, MOHME, WHO, TDR) were searched from 2000 to November 2025. Eligible documents addressed KT in vector-borne diseases. Data were analyzed using framework based on the six-domain KT framework: Knowledge Producer, Knowledge, Knowledge User, Communications, Organization, and Environment. In this review, 97 studies were included. The 134 barriers and 117 facilitators were categorized into six main domains: Knowledge Producer, Knowledge, Knowledge User, Communications, Organization, and Environment. The most frequent barriers included researchers’ limited policy engagement skills and individualistic approaches, fragmented and delayed evidence lacking economic evaluations, policymakers’ low evidence literacy and resistance to change, weak researcher-policymaker linkages, absence of formal KT structures and dedicated budgets, alongside political instability and funding volatility. Additionally, the most frequent facilitators included targeted capacity-building, policy briefs and evidence synthesis, stakeholder dialogues, formal KT platforms, organizational champions, context-adapted multi-sectoral collaborations (including One Health approaches), knowledge brokers, dedicated funding, and sustained researcher-policymaker relationships. This review identifies critical barriers and facilitators of KT for vector-borne disease control. Overcoming the main obstacles through institutional KT structures, capacity building, stronger researcher-policymaker partnerships, and context-adapted multi-sectoral strategies is essential. These actions have the potential to accelerate the translation of research evidence into policy and practice, supporting sustainable prevention and control efforts and reducing vector-borne diseases in endemic regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29578-1
Primary Topic
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Barriers and facilitators of vector-borne diseases knowledge translation: a scoping review

Mahnaz Afshari, Parvaneh Isfahani, Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad
BMC Public Health
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
article

Barriers and facilitators of vector-borne diseases knowledge translation: a scoping review

Mahnaz Afshari, Parvaneh Isfahani, Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad
article en

Abstract

Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) such as leishmaniasis, dengue, and malaria continue to pose major public health challenges, driven by environmental, socioeconomic, and climatic factors. Although numerous studies have generated valuable evidence, research findings are rarely translated into effective policy and practice. This evidence-to-policy gap hinders disease control efforts and leads to wasted resources. Knowledge translation (KT) is critical for bridging this gap. This scoping review maps the barriers and facilitators to KT in VBD control, with particular focus on leishmaniasis, dengue, and malaria. This scoping review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (refined by Levac et al. [1]) and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. English and Persian databases (PubMed, Scopus, MagIran, SID) and grey literature (Google Scholar, MOHME, WHO, TDR) were searched from 2000 to November 2025. Eligible documents addressed KT in vector-borne diseases. Data were analyzed using framework based on the six-domain KT framework: Knowledge Producer, Knowledge, Knowledge User, Communications, Organization, and Environment. In this review, 97 studies were included. The 134 barriers and 117 facilitators were categorized into six main domains: Knowledge Producer, Knowledge, Knowledge User, Communications, Organization, and Environment. The most frequent barriers included researchers’ limited policy engagement skills and individualistic approaches, fragmented and delayed evidence lacking economic evaluations, policymakers’ low evidence literacy and resistance to change, weak researcher-policymaker linkages, absence of formal KT structures and dedicated budgets, alongside political instability and funding volatility. Additionally, the most frequent facilitators included targeted capacity-building, policy briefs and evidence synthesis, stakeholder dialogues, formal KT platforms, organizational champions, context-adapted multi-sectoral collaborations (including One Health approaches), knowledge brokers, dedicated funding, and sustained researcher-policymaker relationships. This review identifies critical barriers and facilitators of KT for vector-borne disease control. Overcoming the main obstacles through institutional KT structures, capacity building, stronger researcher-policymaker partnerships, and context-adapted multi-sectoral strategies is essential. These actions have the potential to accelerate the translation of research evidence into policy and practice, supporting sustainable prevention and control efforts and reducing vector-borne diseases in endemic regions.

BMC Public Health
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran (IR), Zabol University of Medical Sciences (IR), Saveh University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.