Cybersexual moral panics: governing desire in the age of digital censorship

Drawing on the intellectual legacy of Shannon Bell, I argue that pornography has been politically retooled as a capacious moral category through which non-normative gender and sexuality are rendered threats to social order. Focusing on ‘Project 2025’ as a central case study, I demonstrate how anti-porn discourse functions as an infrastructural mechanism for governing trans life in the digital age. Situating recent policies within a longer genealogy of obscenity regulation, the article traces how appeals to child protection mobilize affective economies of fear to justify expanded censorship, surveillance, and platform liability. I show how these dynamics operate across legal frameworks, platform moderation, and public discourse, producing a regulatory formation in which anti-trans, anti-porn, and anti-sex work logics converge. In doing so, this article contributes to porn studies and trans studies by offering a framework for understanding how sexual stigma structures the conditions of digital visibility, precarity, and survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Porn Studies
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2026.2715388
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cybersexual moral panics: governing desire in the age of digital censorship

Jake E. Knight
Porn Studies
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
article

Cybersexual moral panics: governing desire in the age of digital censorship

Jake E. Knight
article en

Abstract

Drawing on the intellectual legacy of Shannon Bell, I argue that pornography has been politically retooled as a capacious moral category through which non-normative gender and sexuality are rendered threats to social order. Focusing on ‘Project 2025’ as a central case study, I demonstrate how anti-porn discourse functions as an infrastructural mechanism for governing trans life in the digital age. Situating recent policies within a longer genealogy of obscenity regulation, the article traces how appeals to child protection mobilize affective economies of fear to justify expanded censorship, surveillance, and platform liability. I show how these dynamics operate across legal frameworks, platform moderation, and public discourse, producing a regulatory formation in which anti-trans, anti-porn, and anti-sex work logics converge. In doing so, this article contributes to porn studies and trans studies by offering a framework for understanding how sexual stigma structures the conditions of digital visibility, precarity, and survival.

Porn Studies
University of California System (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.