Load-bearing capacity and Weibull characteristics of inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis: Effect of zirconia type, bonded substrate and aging

Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the load-bearing capacity and reliability of different zirconia materials used for inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IRFDPs) , considering the influence of substrate type (tooth substrate or resin composite) and thermo-mechanical aging. Materials and methods IRFDPs ( N = 160) were fabricated using four zirconia materials: IPS e.max ZirCAD LT (3Y-TZP), Katana YML (3Y-5Y graded zirconia), Katana HTML Plus, and Katana STML ( n = 40 each). Restorations were adhesively cemented onto tooth or resin composite substrates and tested either under dry conditions or after thermo-mechanical aging (1,200,000 cycles, 50 N, 5–55 °C). Fracture load was determined using monotonic load-to-fracture testing. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Reliability of durability was assessed using Weibull analysis. Results Under dry conditions, material ( p = 0.0047), substrate ( p = 0.0237), and their interaction ( p = 0.0004) significantly influenced fracture load. YML-composite (1406 ± 386 N) and HTML-composite (1142 ± 249 N) showed higher values than STML-composite (553 ± 246 N). No significant differences were observed on tooth. substrate After aging, material and interaction effects remained significant ( p < 0.05). HTML-tooth showed the highest fracture load (1727 ± 351 N), while STML-composite showed the lowest (718 ± 292 N). Weibull analysis indicated comparable reliability after aging. Conclusions Zirconia type and substrate significantly influenced mechanical performance of IRFDPs. High-translucent and graded zirconia showed substrate-dependent behavior, whereas 3Y zirconia was more stable. Clinical relevance Zirconia selection and bonding substrate influence fracture resistance of IRFDPs. High-translucent zirconia requires careful substrate selection, while 3Y zirconia provides more consistent performance in posterior applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-07147-5
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Load-bearing capacity and Weibull characteristics of inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis: Effect of zirconia type, bonded substrate and aging

Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, Luiza Freitas Brum Souza, Meret Helbling, Enkelejd Angelo Cankja et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations
Dental materials and restorations
article

Load-bearing capacity and Weibull characteristics of inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis: Effect of zirconia type, bonded substrate and aging

Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, Luiza Freitas Brum Souza, Meret Helbling, Enkelejd Angelo Cankja, Abdülhakim Alpaslan Sener, Mutlu Özcan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the load-bearing capacity and reliability of different zirconia materials used for inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IRFDPs) , considering the influence of substrate type (tooth substrate or resin composite) and thermo-mechanical aging. Materials and methods IRFDPs ( N = 160) were fabricated using four zirconia materials: IPS e.max ZirCAD LT (3Y-TZP), Katana YML (3Y-5Y graded zirconia), Katana HTML Plus, and Katana STML ( n = 40 each). Restorations were adhesively cemented onto tooth or resin composite substrates and tested either under dry conditions or after thermo-mechanical aging (1,200,000 cycles, 50 N, 5–55 °C). Fracture load was determined using monotonic load-to-fracture testing. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Reliability of durability was assessed using Weibull analysis. Results Under dry conditions, material ( p = 0.0047), substrate ( p = 0.0237), and their interaction ( p = 0.0004) significantly influenced fracture load. YML-composite (1406 ± 386 N) and HTML-composite (1142 ± 249 N) showed higher values than STML-composite (553 ± 246 N). No significant differences were observed on tooth. substrate After aging, material and interaction effects remained significant ( p < 0.05). HTML-tooth showed the highest fracture load (1727 ± 351 N), while STML-composite showed the lowest (718 ± 292 N). Weibull analysis indicated comparable reliability after aging. Conclusions Zirconia type and substrate significantly influenced mechanical performance of IRFDPs. High-translucent and graded zirconia showed substrate-dependent behavior, whereas 3Y zirconia was more stable. Clinical relevance Zirconia selection and bonding substrate influence fracture resistance of IRFDPs. High-translucent zirconia requires careful substrate selection, while 3Y zirconia provides more consistent performance in posterior applications.

Clinical Oral InvestigationsVol. 30(10)
University of Zurich (CH), Istanbul Medipol University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.