Building AI (In)dependence through EU’s AI Factories

This paper analyses the European Union’s flagship initiative to become an international leader in AI: the 19 AI Factories, spread across 16 EU Member States. At the moment, a few large AI companies from the US (‘Big AI’) hold key parts of the AI market. Smaller European startups therefore struggle with barriers to entry, lock-in effects, and dependencies in the global ‘AI race’. The AI Factories try to respond to this – but to what extent can they achieve their high ambitions? By employing a doctrinal analysis of the relevant EU law and semi-structured interviews with nine industry experts (six AI startup representatives, two Big AI representatives, and one AIF representative), the study analyses the capacity of the AI Factories to function as public alternatives to Big AI. Our findings indicate that while the AI Factories – on paper – offer free access for startups to AI-optimised supercomputing, technical support, data services, and regulatory guidance, their real-world impact remains limited at this time. This is mainly due to limited awareness among startups, misalignment with startups’ commercialisation needs, and restrictions that limit AI Factory use to model training rather than deployment. Furthermore, the platform lock-in to Big AI further reduces startups’ willingness to ‘migrate’ and train their models with the AI Factories. The paper concludes that, as of now, the AI Factories alone are unlikely to reduce startups’ reliance on Big AI, but combined with stronger competition enforcement and targeted industrial policy, they could contribute to a more self-reliant European AI system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer law & security review
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2026.106418
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building AI (In)dependence through EU’s AI Factories

Defne Halil, Bram Rijsbosch, Konrad; id_orcid 0000-0002-7412-8731 Kollnig
3 links
Computer law & security review
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

Building AI (In)dependence through EU’s AI Factories

Defne Halil, Bram Rijsbosch, Konrad; id_orcid 0000-0002-7412-8731 Kollnig
article en

Abstract

This paper analyses the European Union’s flagship initiative to become an international leader in AI: the 19 AI Factories, spread across 16 EU Member States. At the moment, a few large AI companies from the US (‘Big AI’) hold key parts of the AI market. Smaller European startups therefore struggle with barriers to entry, lock-in effects, and dependencies in the global ‘AI race’. The AI Factories try to respond to this – but to what extent can they achieve their high ambitions? By employing a doctrinal analysis of the relevant EU law and semi-structured interviews with nine industry experts (six AI startup representatives, two Big AI representatives, and one AIF representative), the study analyses the capacity of the AI Factories to function as public alternatives to Big AI. Our findings indicate that while the AI Factories – on paper – offer free access for startups to AI-optimised supercomputing, technical support, data services, and regulatory guidance, their real-world impact remains limited at this time. This is mainly due to limited awareness among startups, misalignment with startups’ commercialisation needs, and restrictions that limit AI Factory use to model training rather than deployment. Furthermore, the platform lock-in to Big AI further reduces startups’ willingness to ‘migrate’ and train their models with the AI Factories. The paper concludes that, as of now, the AI Factories alone are unlikely to reduce startups’ reliance on Big AI, but combined with stronger competition enforcement and targeted industrial policy, they could contribute to a more self-reliant European AI system.

Computer law & security reviewVol. 63
Maastricht University (NL), Law and Internet Foundation (BG)
European Commission, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon