Legal Plunder: The Predatory Dimensions of Criminal Justice . By Joshua Page and Joe Soss. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 2025.

In the past two decades, the relationship between punishment and political economy has received renewed attention.This resurgence reflects several developments: influential structural accounts of penal and carceral systems (e.g., David Garland, Alessandro De Giorgi, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Loïc Wacquant, and others); innovative comparative and place-based research on how "varieties" of capitalism and local political economies shape punishment (e.g., Lacey 2008; Norton 2015; Simes et al. 2023); and critical organizing projects targeting the system's material injustices (e.g., prison work strikes, debt abolition campaigns, the Defund movement, and emerging scholar-activist groups such as the Law and Political Economy Project).Legal Plunder by Joshua Page and Joe Soss makes a significant contribution to the field by proposing a new analytic framework: predation.Predation synthesizes a range of exploitative and expropriative practices that permeate all aspects of the criminal legal system -from fines, administrative fees, and asset forfeitures to pay-for-service charges behind bars and labor requirements under supervision.New forms of criminal justice predation reflect changes in the U.S. political economy and reveal deepening ties between penal governance, public revenue, and private profit.While Page and Soss rightly describe predation as a "category of analysis" (20), and thus, its theoretical specifications and explanatory reach remain to be fully identified and tested, I see predation as offering a compelling new way to analyze penal systems.Three strengths stand out.First, the book breaks from a recent trend toward mid-level analyses, which focus on single sites or domains of the criminal legal system.Instead, Page and Soss take a big swing, offering predation as a framework for interpreting the system as a whole.This invites our field to interrogate, prove or disprove, and build on the concept.Second, predation offers a new lens to extend or critique other major accounts of the penal system's extra-penological functions.It adds an inclusionary dimension to descriptions of penal institutions as exclusionary or isolating (e.g., Beckett and

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law & Society Review
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/lsr.2026.10113
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Legal Plunder: The Predatory Dimensions of Criminal Justice . By Joshua Page and Joe Soss. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 2025.

Angela LaScala‐Gruenewald
Law & Society Review
Law in Society and Culture
article

Legal Plunder: The Predatory Dimensions of Criminal Justice . By Joshua Page and Joe Soss. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 2025.

Angela LaScala‐Gruenewald
article en

Abstract

In the past two decades, the relationship between punishment and political economy has received renewed attention.This resurgence reflects several developments: influential structural accounts of penal and carceral systems (e.g., David Garland, Alessandro De Giorgi, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Loïc Wacquant, and others); innovative comparative and place-based research on how "varieties" of capitalism and local political economies shape punishment (e.g., Lacey 2008; Norton 2015; Simes et al. 2023); and critical organizing projects targeting the system's material injustices (e.g., prison work strikes, debt abolition campaigns, the Defund movement, and emerging scholar-activist groups such as the Law and Political Economy Project).Legal Plunder by Joshua Page and Joe Soss makes a significant contribution to the field by proposing a new analytic framework: predation.Predation synthesizes a range of exploitative and expropriative practices that permeate all aspects of the criminal legal system -from fines, administrative fees, and asset forfeitures to pay-for-service charges behind bars and labor requirements under supervision.New forms of criminal justice predation reflect changes in the U.S. political economy and reveal deepening ties between penal governance, public revenue, and private profit.While Page and Soss rightly describe predation as a "category of analysis" (20), and thus, its theoretical specifications and explanatory reach remain to be fully identified and tested, I see predation as offering a compelling new way to analyze penal systems.Three strengths stand out.First, the book breaks from a recent trend toward mid-level analyses, which focus on single sites or domains of the criminal legal system.Instead, Page and Soss take a big swing, offering predation as a framework for interpreting the system as a whole.This invites our field to interrogate, prove or disprove, and build on the concept.Second, predation offers a new lens to extend or critique other major accounts of the penal system's extra-penological functions.It adds an inclusionary dimension to descriptions of penal institutions as exclusionary or isolating (e.g., Beckett and

Law & Society Review
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.