Adaptive leadership enactment under structured uncertainty: evidence from a narrative simulation of team sensemaking

Purpose This study aims to examine how adaptive leadership is collectively enacted when teams operate under structured uncertainty, focusing on the interactional processes connecting interpretation, coordination and action. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative, process-oriented study examined 24 graduate public administration students working in six teams within a narrative simulation characterised by incomplete information, shifting constraints and consequential decisions. Analysis integrated recorded interactions, reflections, focus groups, team materials and observational records. Findings Four interrelated patterns emerged: dynamic collective sensemaking, negotiated role fluidity, emotionally regulated collaboration and calibrated decision-making under constraint. These processes operated recursively as teams interpreted changing conditions, redistributed influence, managed interpersonal tension and made provisional commitments. Research limitations/implications The single-institution simulation and dual instructor-researcher role limit transferability. Research should examine these relationships across organisational and public sector contexts. Practical implications Leadership development can cultivate adaptive capacity through uncertainty-rich team experiences emphasising collective interpretation, fluid influence, constructive disagreement and provisional decision-making. Social implications The findings have implications for public sector leadership development and crisis governance, where teams must coordinate collective action under uncertainty. Originality/value The study explains adaptive leadership enactment as a recursive relationship among interpretation, relational coordination and action rather than as discrete leadership behaviours. The study conceptualises structured uncertainty as a bounded contextual condition rather than a distinct form of uncertainty and shows how established leadership processes become interdependent during collective adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of organizational analysis
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-03-2026-6633
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Adaptive leadership enactment under structured uncertainty: evidence from a narrative simulation of team sensemaking

Shawn E. Schooley
International journal of organizational analysis
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Adaptive leadership enactment under structured uncertainty: evidence from a narrative simulation of team sensemaking

Shawn E. Schooley
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how adaptive leadership is collectively enacted when teams operate under structured uncertainty, focusing on the interactional processes connecting interpretation, coordination and action. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative, process-oriented study examined 24 graduate public administration students working in six teams within a narrative simulation characterised by incomplete information, shifting constraints and consequential decisions. Analysis integrated recorded interactions, reflections, focus groups, team materials and observational records. Findings Four interrelated patterns emerged: dynamic collective sensemaking, negotiated role fluidity, emotionally regulated collaboration and calibrated decision-making under constraint. These processes operated recursively as teams interpreted changing conditions, redistributed influence, managed interpersonal tension and made provisional commitments. Research limitations/implications The single-institution simulation and dual instructor-researcher role limit transferability. Research should examine these relationships across organisational and public sector contexts. Practical implications Leadership development can cultivate adaptive capacity through uncertainty-rich team experiences emphasising collective interpretation, fluid influence, constructive disagreement and provisional decision-making. Social implications The findings have implications for public sector leadership development and crisis governance, where teams must coordinate collective action under uncertainty. Originality/value The study explains adaptive leadership enactment as a recursive relationship among interpretation, relational coordination and action rather than as discrete leadership behaviours. The study conceptualises structured uncertainty as a bounded contextual condition rather than a distinct form of uncertainty and shows how established leadership processes become interdependent during collective adaptation.

International journal of organizational analysis
Minnesota State University, Mankato (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adaptive leadership enactment under structured uncertainty: evidence from a narrative simulation of team sensemaking — Shawn E. Schooley · International journal of organizational analysis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS