Attitudes and Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scientific Process of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine Research: A Large‐Scale, International Cross‐Sectional Survey

ABSTRACT Background Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots have shown utility in assisting with various research tasks. Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) is a patient‐centric approach that emphasizes holistic well‐being. The integration of TCIM and GenAI presents numerous key opportunities. However, TCIM researchers’ attitudes toward GenAI tools remain less understood. This large‐scale, international cross‐sectional survey aimed to elucidate the attitudes and perceptions of TCIM researchers regarding the use of GenAI chatbots in the scientific process. Methods A search strategy in MEDLINE (via Ovid) identified corresponding authors who were TCIM researchers. Eligible authors were invited to complete an anonymous online survey administered via SurveyMonkey. The survey included questions on sociodemographic characteristics, familiarity with GenAI chatbots, and perceived benefits and challenges of using GenAI chatbots. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis. Results A total of 716 survey responses were received. Most respondents reported familiarity with GenAI chatbots (58.08%) and viewed them as very important to the future of scientific research (54.37%). The most acknowledged benefits included workload reduction (74.07%) and increased efficiency in data analysis/experimentation (71.14%). The most frequently reported challenges involved bias, errors, and limitations. More than half of the respondents (84.08%) expressed a need for training to use GenAI chatbots in the scientific process, alongside an interest in receiving training (72.07%). However, 43.67% indicated that their institutions did not offer these programs. Conclusions By deepening understanding of TCIM researchers' perspectives, these findings can inform future GenAI applications, policies, and collaborations in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.70189
Primary Topic
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Attitudes and Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scientific Process of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine Research: A Large‐Scale, International Cross‐Sectional Survey

Karthik Adapa, Melinda R. Ring, Jeremy Y. Ng, Darshan H. Mehta et al.
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
article

Attitudes and Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Scientific Process of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine Research: A Large‐Scale, International Cross‐Sectional Survey

Karthik Adapa, Melinda R. Ring, Jeremy Y. Ng, Darshan H. Mehta, Holger Cramer, Niveen Syed, Tetsuhiro Yoshino, Myeong Soo Lee, Prashant Kumar Gupta, Jamie Tan, Manisha Shridhar, Joao Paulo Souza, Shao Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots have shown utility in assisting with various research tasks. Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) is a patient‐centric approach that emphasizes holistic well‐being. The integration of TCIM and GenAI presents numerous key opportunities. However, TCIM researchers’ attitudes toward GenAI tools remain less understood. This large‐scale, international cross‐sectional survey aimed to elucidate the attitudes and perceptions of TCIM researchers regarding the use of GenAI chatbots in the scientific process. Methods A search strategy in MEDLINE (via Ovid) identified corresponding authors who were TCIM researchers. Eligible authors were invited to complete an anonymous online survey administered via SurveyMonkey. The survey included questions on sociodemographic characteristics, familiarity with GenAI chatbots, and perceived benefits and challenges of using GenAI chatbots. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis. Results A total of 716 survey responses were received. Most respondents reported familiarity with GenAI chatbots (58.08%) and viewed them as very important to the future of scientific research (54.37%). The most acknowledged benefits included workload reduction (74.07%) and increased efficiency in data analysis/experimentation (71.14%). The most frequently reported challenges involved bias, errors, and limitations. More than half of the respondents (84.08%) expressed a need for training to use GenAI chatbots in the scientific process, alongside an interest in receiving training (72.07%). However, 43.67% indicated that their institutions did not offer these programs. Conclusions By deepening understanding of TCIM researchers' perspectives, these findings can inform future GenAI applications, policies, and collaborations in the field.

Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Northwestern University (US), University of Technology Sydney (AU), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Keio University (JP), Robert Bosch Hospital (DE), National Institute of Ayurveda (IN), Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KR), World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia (IN), Ministry of AYUSH (IN), Benson-Henry Institute (US), Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde (BR), Pan American Health Organization (Cuba) (CU), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA), Robert Bosch (Germany) (DE), McMaster University (CA), Tsinghua University (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.