Assessing Residency Readiness: Patterns of “Not Yet Level 1” Milestone Ratings in Emergency Medicine Interns

ABSTRACT Background To characterize the extent and domains of variability in Emergency Medicine (EM) residency preparedness by evaluating “Not Yet Level 1” (NotYL1) Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones ratings among US MD‐graduated interns at mid‐year and end‐of‐year. Method This was a national retrospective analysis of ACGME Milestone assessments for 6893 US MD‐graduated EM interns from 2021 through 2024. For each of the 22 EM sub‐competencies, we calculated the percentages of interns assigned a NotYL1 rating at both the mid‐year and end‐of‐year assessment periods. Results Overall, NotYL1 ratings were < 4%. At mid‐year, the mean NotYL1 percentage across sub‐competencies was 2.5% (range: 1.8%–3.3%), decreasing to 0.4% (range: 0.2%–1.0%) at end‐of‐year. At mid‐year, the highest proportions of NotYL1 ratings were concentrated in all Systems‐Based Practice (SBP) sub‐competencies—including Patient Safety (SBP1; 3.0%), Quality Improvement (SBP2; 3.2%), System Navigation (SBP3; 3.0%), and the Physician Role in Health Care Systems (SBP4; 3.3%)—as well as Pharmacotherapy (PC5; 3.1%) and Accountability/Conscientiousness (PROF2; 3.2%). By end‐of‐year, nearly all interns achieved Level 1 or higher, though PROF2 remained the highest outlier at 1.0%. Conclusions US MD graduates demonstrate strong overall readiness for EM residency, with most initial gaps resolving by the end of the first year. However, consistent mid‐year deficits in systems‐based practice and professionalism (accountability/conscientiousness) highlight critical targets for undergraduate medical school accountability, transition‐to‐residency curricula, and targeted residency onboarding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AEM Education and Training
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.70259
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessing Residency Readiness: Patterns of “Not Yet Level 1” Milestone Ratings in Emergency Medicine Interns

Guiliano Melki, Luan E. Lawson, Anita M. Wilson, Sean O. Hogan et al.
AEM Education and Training
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Assessing Residency Readiness: Patterns of “Not Yet Level 1” Milestone Ratings in Emergency Medicine Interns

Guiliano Melki, Luan E. Lawson, Anita M. Wilson, Sean O. Hogan, Michael S. Ryan, Sally A. Santen, Amanda R. Emke, Yoon Soo Park, Katherine Berg, Adnan Alseidi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background To characterize the extent and domains of variability in Emergency Medicine (EM) residency preparedness by evaluating “Not Yet Level 1” (NotYL1) Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones ratings among US MD‐graduated interns at mid‐year and end‐of‐year. Method This was a national retrospective analysis of ACGME Milestone assessments for 6893 US MD‐graduated EM interns from 2021 through 2024. For each of the 22 EM sub‐competencies, we calculated the percentages of interns assigned a NotYL1 rating at both the mid‐year and end‐of‐year assessment periods. Results Overall, NotYL1 ratings were < 4%. At mid‐year, the mean NotYL1 percentage across sub‐competencies was 2.5% (range: 1.8%–3.3%), decreasing to 0.4% (range: 0.2%–1.0%) at end‐of‐year. At mid‐year, the highest proportions of NotYL1 ratings were concentrated in all Systems‐Based Practice (SBP) sub‐competencies—including Patient Safety (SBP1; 3.0%), Quality Improvement (SBP2; 3.2%), System Navigation (SBP3; 3.0%), and the Physician Role in Health Care Systems (SBP4; 3.3%)—as well as Pharmacotherapy (PC5; 3.1%) and Accountability/Conscientiousness (PROF2; 3.2%). By end‐of‐year, nearly all interns achieved Level 1 or higher, though PROF2 remained the highest outlier at 1.0%. Conclusions US MD graduates demonstrate strong overall readiness for EM residency, with most initial gaps resolving by the end of the first year. However, consistent mid‐year deficits in systems‐based practice and professionalism (accountability/conscientiousness) highlight critical targets for undergraduate medical school accountability, transition‐to‐residency curricula, and targeted residency onboarding.

AEM Education and TrainingVol. 10(5)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Illinois College (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (US), University of Virginia (US), University of San Francisco (US), Jefferson College (US), Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.