Characterizing the Genetic Counselor's Role in Hematology

ABSTRACT Hematology is an emerging subspecialty in genetic counseling. In order to standardize current practice and provide a solid foundation for advancement and growth, it is crucial to characterize the role of genetic counselors (GCs) working in this space. To date, no such characterization has been established. The purpose of this study was to characterize the roles of genetic counselors working in the field of hematology, explore GCs' preparedness for work in hematology, and assess whether non‐hematology GCs perceived a value in having designated hematology GCs at their institutions. A survey distributed through the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) listserv yielded responses from 92 individuals meeting the inclusion criteria, with 84 participants providing complete responses that were analyzed in this study. Numerous aspects of the roles of the hematology genetic counselor role were characterized, including job settings (clinical: multidisciplinary team, independent visits, hematologist‐paired; non‐clinical), patient population served (diagnoses and quantity/length/recurrence of visits), and elements of genetic counseling competencies and skills utilized in various settings. Hematology‐specific knowledge acquisition was reported to occur largely outside of typical didactic and experiential components of GC training programs, commonly via independent learning and also through on‐the‐job training sometimes supported by GC or hematology colleagues. Seventy percent of non‐hematology GCs indicated that it would be beneficial to have a designated hematology GC at their institutions, citing feeling less equipped to see all hematological indications. The findings from this study begin to define the current roles of hematology GCs, emphasize the need for dedicated resources and expertise to address patient needs in this subspecialty. Ultimately, this can inform opportunities for expansion of the field further into the hematology domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70294
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Characterizing the Genetic Counselor's Role in Hematology

Dominika Bajguz, Radhika N. Sawh, Stefanie N. Dugan, Luise Johannes et al.
Journal of Genetic Counseling
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Characterizing the Genetic Counselor's Role in Hematology

Dominika Bajguz, Radhika N. Sawh, Stefanie N. Dugan, Luise Johannes, Kira Dzedzy, Hannah L. Helber
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hematology is an emerging subspecialty in genetic counseling. In order to standardize current practice and provide a solid foundation for advancement and growth, it is crucial to characterize the role of genetic counselors (GCs) working in this space. To date, no such characterization has been established. The purpose of this study was to characterize the roles of genetic counselors working in the field of hematology, explore GCs' preparedness for work in hematology, and assess whether non‐hematology GCs perceived a value in having designated hematology GCs at their institutions. A survey distributed through the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) listserv yielded responses from 92 individuals meeting the inclusion criteria, with 84 participants providing complete responses that were analyzed in this study. Numerous aspects of the roles of the hematology genetic counselor role were characterized, including job settings (clinical: multidisciplinary team, independent visits, hematologist‐paired; non‐clinical), patient population served (diagnoses and quantity/length/recurrence of visits), and elements of genetic counseling competencies and skills utilized in various settings. Hematology‐specific knowledge acquisition was reported to occur largely outside of typical didactic and experiential components of GC training programs, commonly via independent learning and also through on‐the‐job training sometimes supported by GC or hematology colleagues. Seventy percent of non‐hematology GCs indicated that it would be beneficial to have a designated hematology GC at their institutions, citing feeling less equipped to see all hematological indications. The findings from this study begin to define the current roles of hematology GCs, emphasize the need for dedicated resources and expertise to address patient needs in this subspecialty. Ultimately, this can inform opportunities for expansion of the field further into the hematology domain.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 35(5)
Baylor College of Medicine (US), Medical Diagnostic Laboratories (United States) (US), Versiti Blood Center of Wisconsin (US), Texas Children's Hospital (US), Sarah Lawrence College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.