The great detour and the need for macroeconomic theory

Abstract This paper makes three points. First, big data, advanced econometrics and sophisticated computational techniques do not obviate the need for macroeconomic theory and small, analytical models. The design and interpretation of empirical studies and large-scale models are guided by economic theory. Second, the current macroeconomic theory employs simplistic microeconomic assumptions with little empirical support, imposes heroic restrictions on interaction structures and agent heterogeneity, and applies the same models to economies with widely different structures and institutions. Third, a more fruitful structuralist and behavioral approach builds on empirical evidence of systematic, macroeconomically relevant behavioral patterns, recognizes the effects of structural and institutional factors, and places the interaction across sectors and between different types of decision makers at the center of the analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-026-00500-7
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The great detour and the need for macroeconomic theory

Peter Skott
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
article

The great detour and the need for macroeconomic theory

Peter Skott
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper makes three points. First, big data, advanced econometrics and sophisticated computational techniques do not obviate the need for macroeconomic theory and small, analytical models. The design and interpretation of empirical studies and large-scale models are guided by economic theory. Second, the current macroeconomic theory employs simplistic microeconomic assumptions with little empirical support, imposes heroic restrictions on interaction structures and agent heterogeneity, and applies the same models to economies with widely different structures and institutions. Third, a more fruitful structuralist and behavioral approach builds on empirical evidence of systematic, macroeconomically relevant behavioral patterns, recognizes the effects of structural and institutional factors, and places the interaction across sectors and between different types of decision makers at the center of the analysis.

Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.