Machine Learning–Based Optimization of Phthalate Extraction Conditions Using HS‐INME‐GC/MS Data

ABSTRACT Optimization of extraction conditions in GC/MS analysis remains challenging because experimental variables can interact in complex and nonlinear ways. In this study, a machine learning based chemometric workflow was applied to optimize headspace in‐needle microextraction GC/MS (HS‐INME‐GC/MS) conditions for four phthalates: dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), and di(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). A dataset comprising 75 experimental data points was used with saturation temperature, adsorption time, and desorption time as input variables. Ten regression models were evaluated, and five candidate models were further examined using feature importance, partial dependence, Pareto front analysis, desirability functions, and supporting robustness evaluation. Feature importance and partial dependence analyses showed that adsorption time and desorption time were generally more influential than saturation temperature. Among the candidate models, SVR and XGBoost were retained for the final confirmatory interpretation because their predicted conditions were close to the condition evaluated in the confirmatory experiments. Confirmatory experiments at 50.0°C saturation temperature, 50.0‐min adsorption time, and 5.0‐min desorption time showed good agreement between predicted and observed responses. These findings suggest that the proposed workflow provides a complementary chemometric approach for model comparison, response visualization, and balanced optimization of analytical extraction conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemometrics
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.70181
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Machine Learning–Based Optimization of Phthalate Extraction Conditions Using HS‐INME‐GC/MS Data

Sunyoung Bae, Jooyoung Kim, Hyeyoung Jung
Journal of Chemometrics
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

Machine Learning–Based Optimization of Phthalate Extraction Conditions Using HS‐INME‐GC/MS Data

Sunyoung Bae, Jooyoung Kim, Hyeyoung Jung
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Optimization of extraction conditions in GC/MS analysis remains challenging because experimental variables can interact in complex and nonlinear ways. In this study, a machine learning based chemometric workflow was applied to optimize headspace in‐needle microextraction GC/MS (HS‐INME‐GC/MS) conditions for four phthalates: dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), and di(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). A dataset comprising 75 experimental data points was used with saturation temperature, adsorption time, and desorption time as input variables. Ten regression models were evaluated, and five candidate models were further examined using feature importance, partial dependence, Pareto front analysis, desirability functions, and supporting robustness evaluation. Feature importance and partial dependence analyses showed that adsorption time and desorption time were generally more influential than saturation temperature. Among the candidate models, SVR and XGBoost were retained for the final confirmatory interpretation because their predicted conditions were close to the condition evaluated in the confirmatory experiments. Confirmatory experiments at 50.0°C saturation temperature, 50.0‐min adsorption time, and 5.0‐min desorption time showed good agreement between predicted and observed responses. These findings suggest that the proposed workflow provides a complementary chemometric approach for model comparison, response visualization, and balanced optimization of analytical extraction conditions.

Journal of ChemometricsVol. 40(10)
Seoul Women's University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.