Epistemic Injustices in Islands of Conscious Power: Outsourcing and Epistemic Barriers in Claim-Making

Abstract Outsourcing has increasingly become a dominant trend in global production, as firms disintegrate vertically by externalizing non-core functions and procuring these services from the market. This process increasingly organizes production through inter-firm contracting arrangements, shifting hierarchical control from internal managers to external buyers who leverage market power. This article examines the epistemic injustices that workers face in the context of such transformations. Adopting a worker-centric perspective, it theorizes the epistemic barriers workers encounter when asserting their rights after outsourcing. These barriers include exclusion from internal norms, ultracomplex accountability chains, eroding incentives to speak out, and searching for an effective audience. The central claim is that outsourcing, as presently organized, often foreseeably produces epistemic harms from which firms benefit. An epistemic injustice lens helps bring this neglected dimension of labour injustice into view.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-026-06464-9
Primary Topic
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Epistemic Injustices in Islands of Conscious Power: Outsourcing and Epistemic Barriers in Claim-Making

Chi Kwok
Journal of Business Ethics
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
article

Epistemic Injustices in Islands of Conscious Power: Outsourcing and Epistemic Barriers in Claim-Making

Chi Kwok
article en

Abstract

Abstract Outsourcing has increasingly become a dominant trend in global production, as firms disintegrate vertically by externalizing non-core functions and procuring these services from the market. This process increasingly organizes production through inter-firm contracting arrangements, shifting hierarchical control from internal managers to external buyers who leverage market power. This article examines the epistemic injustices that workers face in the context of such transformations. Adopting a worker-centric perspective, it theorizes the epistemic barriers workers encounter when asserting their rights after outsourcing. These barriers include exclusion from internal norms, ultracomplex accountability chains, eroding incentives to speak out, and searching for an effective audience. The central claim is that outsourcing, as presently organized, often foreseeably produces epistemic harms from which firms benefit. An epistemic injustice lens helps bring this neglected dimension of labour injustice into view.

Journal of Business Ethics
Lingnan University (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Epistemic Injustices in Islands of Conscious Power: Outsourcing and Epistemic Barriers in Claim-Making — Chi Kwok · Journal of Business Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS