Auditable Conformance and Cross-Library Interoperability Testing for ML-KEM and ML-DSA

An implementation that passes internal round-trip tests may still produce artifacts that another library cannot consume. We present an auditable workflow for selected-vector conformance and raw-artifact interoperability testing of ML-KEM and ML-DSA in liboqs and PQMagic. The workflow links FIPS 203/204 Automated Cryptographic Validation Protocol (ACVP) projections, bidirectional producer–consumer cases, and deterministic negative tests to vector and binary hashes. For pinned liboqs 0.15.0 and PQMagic-SHAKE builds, both adapters matched all 690 expected implementation-vector outcomes across ML-KEM-512/768/1024 and ML-DSA-44/65/87. All 1200 bidirectional positive cases and 90 deliberately sparse deterministic one-bit mutation cases produced their specified outcomes. A supporting regression check passed 12 persisted-artifact replay cases between two PQMagic builds from the same commit; it does not establish cross-version compatibility. Performance measurements provide a descriptive single-session snapshot on one Windows host, with 50 timed batch observations per operation. Aigis and SHAKE/SM3 comparisons are supporting configuration analyses, not extensions of the standardized cross-library compatibility claim. The accompanying deployment considerations are a taxonomy and checklist, not a validated decision procedure. The contribution is an auditable record of specified artifact-level behavior, bounded by the selected vectors, recorded commits, host, and interfaces. It does not establish product certification, protocol interoperability, or stable performance rankings across sessions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15100642
Primary Topic
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Auditable Conformance and Cross-Library Interoperability Testing for ML-KEM and ML-DSA

Sijiang Xie, Xingyu Lu, Hong Zhao, Haida Wang
Computers
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
article

Auditable Conformance and Cross-Library Interoperability Testing for ML-KEM and ML-DSA

Sijiang Xie, Xingyu Lu, Hong Zhao, Haida Wang
article en

Abstract

An implementation that passes internal round-trip tests may still produce artifacts that another library cannot consume. We present an auditable workflow for selected-vector conformance and raw-artifact interoperability testing of ML-KEM and ML-DSA in liboqs and PQMagic. The workflow links FIPS 203/204 Automated Cryptographic Validation Protocol (ACVP) projections, bidirectional producer–consumer cases, and deterministic negative tests to vector and binary hashes. For pinned liboqs 0.15.0 and PQMagic-SHAKE builds, both adapters matched all 690 expected implementation-vector outcomes across ML-KEM-512/768/1024 and ML-DSA-44/65/87. All 1200 bidirectional positive cases and 90 deliberately sparse deterministic one-bit mutation cases produced their specified outcomes. A supporting regression check passed 12 persisted-artifact replay cases between two PQMagic builds from the same commit; it does not establish cross-version compatibility. Performance measurements provide a descriptive single-session snapshot on one Windows host, with 50 timed batch observations per operation. Aigis and SHAKE/SM3 comparisons are supporting configuration analyses, not extensions of the standardized cross-library compatibility claim. The accompanying deployment considerations are a taxonomy and checklist, not a validated decision procedure. The contribution is an auditable record of specified artifact-level behavior, bounded by the selected vectors, recorded commits, host, and interfaces. It does not establish product certification, protocol interoperability, or stable performance rankings across sessions.

ComputersVol. 15(10)
Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Auditable Conformance and Cross-Library Interoperability Testing for ML-KEM and ML-DSA — Sijiang Xie, Xingyu Lu, et al. · Computers (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS