Physics-informed multi-fidelity modeling of single-track geometry in laser directed energy deposition

Accurate prediction of single-track geometry in laser directed energy deposition remains challenging when only limited experimental data are available. This study proposes a physics-informed multi-fidelity framework, in which physics is embedded through response-specific low-fidelity priors rather than through direct physical constraints on the Gaussian-process surrogate. Specifically, the Eagar–Tsai heat-conduction model provides low-fidelity priors for clad width and penetration depth, while a semi-physical model based on mass conservation and cross-sectional geometric closure provides the prior for deposition height. These priors are fused with high-fidelity experimental measurements through a multi-fidelity Gaussian process to learn structured LF–HF discrepancies and quantify prediction uncertainty. Forty single-track experiments were conducted using laser power, scanning speed, and powder feed rate as input variables. On eight reserved independent test samples, the proposed model achieved R 2 values of 0.941, 0.918, and 0.969 for width, depth, and height, respectively, outperforming RSM, HF-only GP, and SVR models. The framework also provides guidance for balancing predictive accuracy, uncertainty, and experimental cost through HF/LF data-allocation analysis. These results demonstrate that response-specific low-fidelity priors combined with limited experimental data can provide accurate, interpretable, and uncertainty-aware geometry prediction for L-DED under small-sample conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optics & Laser Technology
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2026.116444
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Physics-informed multi-fidelity modeling of single-track geometry in laser directed energy deposition

Qiaofeng Bai, Weifeng Chai, Oukai Liu, Chunjiang Zhao
Optics & Laser Technology
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Physics-informed multi-fidelity modeling of single-track geometry in laser directed energy deposition

Qiaofeng Bai, Weifeng Chai, Oukai Liu, Chunjiang Zhao
article en

Abstract

Accurate prediction of single-track geometry in laser directed energy deposition remains challenging when only limited experimental data are available. This study proposes a physics-informed multi-fidelity framework, in which physics is embedded through response-specific low-fidelity priors rather than through direct physical constraints on the Gaussian-process surrogate. Specifically, the Eagar–Tsai heat-conduction model provides low-fidelity priors for clad width and penetration depth, while a semi-physical model based on mass conservation and cross-sectional geometric closure provides the prior for deposition height. These priors are fused with high-fidelity experimental measurements through a multi-fidelity Gaussian process to learn structured LF–HF discrepancies and quantify prediction uncertainty. Forty single-track experiments were conducted using laser power, scanning speed, and powder feed rate as input variables. On eight reserved independent test samples, the proposed model achieved R 2 values of 0.941, 0.918, and 0.969 for width, depth, and height, respectively, outperforming RSM, HF-only GP, and SVR models. The framework also provides guidance for balancing predictive accuracy, uncertainty, and experimental cost through HF/LF data-allocation analysis. These results demonstrate that response-specific low-fidelity priors combined with limited experimental data can provide accurate, interpretable, and uncertainty-aware geometry prediction for L-DED under small-sample conditions.

Optics & Laser TechnologyVol. 204
Shanxi Science and Technology Department (CN), Taiyuan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.