Fueling service initiative: how AI assimilation shapes employees' proactive service behavior through AI crafting

Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally reshaping how employees engage in service work. However, few studies have examined how AI assimilation (i.e. the extent to which AI technology is integrated and routinized in work activities and processes) affects employees' proactive behaviors. This study investigates how the breadth and depth of AI assimilation shape proactive service behavior, examines the mediating roles of approach and avoidance AI crafting, and tests job autonomy as a moderator. It further examines whether employees exhibit higher proactive service behavior when these two crafting strategies are used in a more balanced way. Design/methodology/approach Based on Conservation Of Resources (COR) theory, this study uses paired-sample survey data from 234 employee-manager pairs in China's service industry. Stepwise regression, polynomial regression, and response surface analysis are applied to test the hypotheses. Findings The results show that both the depth and breadth of AI assimilation positively influence proactive service behavior. Approach AI crafting mediates both relationships, while avoidance AI crafting only mediates the relationship between the breadth of AI assimilation and proactive service behavior. Employees exhibit the highest level of proactive service behavior when using both crafting strategies in balance, indicating that approach and avoidance AI crafting are complementary. Furthermore, job autonomy strengthens the positive effect of AI assimilation on approach AI crafting, while weakening its positive effect on avoidance AI crafting. Originality/value This study advances service operations management research by shifting attention from AI adoption to AI assimilation and specifying the mechanism through which AI assimilation shapes frontline employees' proactive service behavior. It also challenges the traditional dichotomous view in job crafting by proposing that approach and avoidance AI crafting may be complementary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of service management
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-08-2025-0421
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Fueling service initiative: how AI assimilation shapes employees' proactive service behavior through AI crafting

Chunping Deng, Yuye Wang, Fanchen Kong, Qing Yu
Journal of service management
AI in Service Interactions
article

Fueling service initiative: how AI assimilation shapes employees' proactive service behavior through AI crafting

Chunping Deng, Yuye Wang, Fanchen Kong, Qing Yu
article en

Abstract

Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally reshaping how employees engage in service work. However, few studies have examined how AI assimilation (i.e. the extent to which AI technology is integrated and routinized in work activities and processes) affects employees' proactive behaviors. This study investigates how the breadth and depth of AI assimilation shape proactive service behavior, examines the mediating roles of approach and avoidance AI crafting, and tests job autonomy as a moderator. It further examines whether employees exhibit higher proactive service behavior when these two crafting strategies are used in a more balanced way. Design/methodology/approach Based on Conservation Of Resources (COR) theory, this study uses paired-sample survey data from 234 employee-manager pairs in China's service industry. Stepwise regression, polynomial regression, and response surface analysis are applied to test the hypotheses. Findings The results show that both the depth and breadth of AI assimilation positively influence proactive service behavior. Approach AI crafting mediates both relationships, while avoidance AI crafting only mediates the relationship between the breadth of AI assimilation and proactive service behavior. Employees exhibit the highest level of proactive service behavior when using both crafting strategies in balance, indicating that approach and avoidance AI crafting are complementary. Furthermore, job autonomy strengthens the positive effect of AI assimilation on approach AI crafting, while weakening its positive effect on avoidance AI crafting. Originality/value This study advances service operations management research by shifting attention from AI adoption to AI assimilation and specifying the mechanism through which AI assimilation shapes frontline employees' proactive service behavior. It also challenges the traditional dichotomous view in job crafting by proposing that approach and avoidance AI crafting may be complementary.

Journal of service management
Beijing Technology and Business University (CN), Government of Russia (RU), Shandong University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.