A Unified Equivalent Driving Force for Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis

ABSTRACT This paper challenges the use of the effective stress intensity factor range, Δ K eff = K max − K op , as a universal fatigue crack driving force, which has dominated fatigue crack growth research for more than five decades. The fundamental deficiency of the empirically based Δ K eff formulation is that it combines intrinsic and extrinsic parameters, thereby obscuring the true physical driving force governing fatigue crack propagation. In contrast, the proposed framework establishes a physically consistent intrinsic description of fatigue crack growth based on fundamental energy considerations and the principle of equivalent displacement. The resulting driving force inherently accounts for load‐ratio ( R ‐ratio) effects without relying on crack‐closure assumptions or closure measurements, thereby providing a unified and rigorous foundation for fatigue crack growth analysis across multiple length scales. Furthermore, the nondimensional ratio Δ K /Δ K 0 , evaluated at a constant crack‐growth rate (da/dN), provides insight into the identification of single or multiple crack‐growth mechanisms governed by the applied stress‐intensity range, Δ K , and/or load ratio, R . The validity and broad applicability of the framework are demonstrated using fatigue crack growth data for relevant engineering alloys widely used in structural applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.70470
Primary Topic
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Unified Equivalent Driving Force for Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis

Daniel Kujawski
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
article

A Unified Equivalent Driving Force for Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis

Daniel Kujawski
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper challenges the use of the effective stress intensity factor range, Δ K eff = K max − K op , as a universal fatigue crack driving force, which has dominated fatigue crack growth research for more than five decades. The fundamental deficiency of the empirically based Δ K eff formulation is that it combines intrinsic and extrinsic parameters, thereby obscuring the true physical driving force governing fatigue crack propagation. In contrast, the proposed framework establishes a physically consistent intrinsic description of fatigue crack growth based on fundamental energy considerations and the principle of equivalent displacement. The resulting driving force inherently accounts for load‐ratio ( R ‐ratio) effects without relying on crack‐closure assumptions or closure measurements, thereby providing a unified and rigorous foundation for fatigue crack growth analysis across multiple length scales. Furthermore, the nondimensional ratio Δ K /Δ K 0 , evaluated at a constant crack‐growth rate (da/dN), provides insight into the identification of single or multiple crack‐growth mechanisms governed by the applied stress‐intensity range, Δ K , and/or load ratio, R . The validity and broad applicability of the framework are demonstrated using fatigue crack growth data for relevant engineering alloys widely used in structural applications.

Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Western Michigan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Unified Equivalent Driving Force for Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis — Daniel Kujawski · Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS