Real-World Experience With the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Through 1 Year: The Enlighten Post Approval Registry Study

BACKGROUND: The extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (EV-ICD) was developed to provide defibrillation and antitachycardia pacing therapy without the need for intravascular lead placement. Premarket clinical trials reported EV-ICD safety and efficacy through 3 years, but a real-world assessment of the Aurora EV-ICD system, which includes a novel sensing discriminator, is needed. The objective of this analysis was to assess real-world therapy efficacy and safety of the EV-ICD through 1 year. METHODS: Enlighten: The EV-ICD Post Approval Registry is a prospective, global, real-world registry that included patients who underwent an EV-ICD implantation attempt. The main safety analysis was freedom from all system- or procedure-related major complications through 1 year. Event rates at 1 year were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: EV-ICD system implantation was attempted by 168 implanters in 787 patients (49.1±15.2 years old; 28.7% women; 34.1% secondary prevention). Tunneling and lead placement in the substernal space were achieved in 781 of 787 patients (99.2%), with 758 patients (96.3%) remaining implanted following defibrillation and electrical testing. One-year freedom from major system- or procedure-related complications was 89.1% (95% CI, 86.3%–91.3%). The 1-year rate of first appropriate therapy (shock, antitachycardia pacing, or both) was 7.3% (95% CI, 5.5–9.6). Shock success for discrete spontaneous episodes was 100% (61 of 61), and the generalized estimating equations antitachycardia pacing success rate, to account for multiple episodes per patient, was 74.2% for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. The 1-year rate of first inappropriate shock was 7.1% (95% CI, 5.4–9.4), with noncardiac oversensing as the main cause (40.5% of inappropriately shocked episodes). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest prospective worldwide cohort of patients with an EV-ICD to date, both antitachycardia pacing and shock therapy were effective, while the rate of major complications agreed with the premarket experience through 1 year. These data demonstrate that positive outcomes of the EV-ICD are retained in everyday clinical practice in a large, global cohort with an expanded number of implanters. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT06048731.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.126.080942
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Real-World Experience With the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Through 1 Year: The Enlighten Post Approval Registry Study

Alexander Breitenstein, Pamela Kay Mason, Thomas R. Holmes, Nicolas Clémenty et al.
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Real-World Experience With the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Through 1 Year: The Enlighten Post Approval Registry Study

Alexander Breitenstein, Pamela Kay Mason, Thomas R. Holmes, Nicolas Clémenty, Paul A. Friedman, Ian Crozier, Laurence Mark Epstein, Jurren M. van Opstal, Amy E. Thompson, Jens Brock Johansen, Jaime Casares, Marianne Gwechenberger, Maciej M. Sterlinski, David Duncker, Lucas V.A. Boersma, Anish K. Amin, Jeffrey D. Lande, Theodore Takata, Gregory Engel, Christopher Wiggenhorn, Francis Murgatroyd, Oliver Monfredi, Jennifer Lee, Nobuhiro Nishii, Karim Saleh, on behalf of the Enlighten Study Investigators
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (EV-ICD) was developed to provide defibrillation and antitachycardia pacing therapy without the need for intravascular lead placement. Premarket clinical trials reported EV-ICD safety and efficacy through 3 years, but a real-world assessment of the Aurora EV-ICD system, which includes a novel sensing discriminator, is needed. The objective of this analysis was to assess real-world therapy efficacy and safety of the EV-ICD through 1 year. METHODS: Enlighten: The EV-ICD Post Approval Registry is a prospective, global, real-world registry that included patients who underwent an EV-ICD implantation attempt. The main safety analysis was freedom from all system- or procedure-related major complications through 1 year. Event rates at 1 year were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: EV-ICD system implantation was attempted by 168 implanters in 787 patients (49.1±15.2 years old; 28.7% women; 34.1% secondary prevention). Tunneling and lead placement in the substernal space were achieved in 781 of 787 patients (99.2%), with 758 patients (96.3%) remaining implanted following defibrillation and electrical testing. One-year freedom from major system- or procedure-related complications was 89.1% (95% CI, 86.3%–91.3%). The 1-year rate of first appropriate therapy (shock, antitachycardia pacing, or both) was 7.3% (95% CI, 5.5–9.6). Shock success for discrete spontaneous episodes was 100% (61 of 61), and the generalized estimating equations antitachycardia pacing success rate, to account for multiple episodes per patient, was 74.2% for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. The 1-year rate of first inappropriate shock was 7.1% (95% CI, 5.4–9.4), with noncardiac oversensing as the main cause (40.5% of inappropriately shocked episodes). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest prospective worldwide cohort of patients with an EV-ICD to date, both antitachycardia pacing and shock therapy were effective, while the rate of major complications agreed with the premarket experience through 1 year. These data demonstrate that positive outcomes of the EV-ICD are retained in everyday clinical practice in a large, global cohort with an expanded number of implanters. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT06048731.

Circulation
Sutter Health (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Okayama University (JP), Riverside Methodist Hospital (US), Odense University Hospital (DK), Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Clinique du Millénaire (FR), St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL), Zurich Heart House (CH), Kepler Universitätsklinikum (AT), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), King's College Hospital (GB), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.