A short form of the cybersecurity resilience scale (CSRS-20): development and initial cross-cultural validation

Purpose This study conducted a psychometric evaluation of a 20-item short form of the Cybersecurity Resilience Scale (CSRS-20), designed to reduce respondent burden while retaining the core conceptual coverage. The short form focuses on individual-level cybersecurity resilience (CSR), defined as the capacity to recognize, respond to and recover from cybersecurity threats through increasingly advanced protective behaviors. The purpose of this study was to conduct a psychometric evaluation of a 20-item short form of the Cybersecurity Resilience Scale (CSRS-20). Design/methodology/approach A two-stage validation procedure was used. First, item reduction and exploratory analyses with a Turkish sample (n = 805) produced a 20-item version. Because the advanced behavioral domains did not separate empirically once the item pool was reduced, the short form resolved into three dimensions rather than the five of the parent scale. Second, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with an independent international sample (n = 1,040) from Pakistan, Kuwait and Türkiye tested the stability of this three-factor structure. Additional analyses assessed reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, measurement invariance and nomological validity. Findings A three-factor structure fit the data well and outperformed one-factor and bifactor alternatives. Internal consistency was strong for all three dimensions. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported, and the reduction to three dimensions resolved the discriminant-validity overlap observed among the advanced domains of the full-length scale. Multi-group CFA supported configural and metric invariance across the three national samples, suggesting that the factor structure and factor loadings were comparable across groups. Nomological analyses showed theoretically consistent associations between CSRS-20 scores, theory of planned behavior constructs and perceptions of educational sustainability in AI-supported learning contexts. Originality/value The CSRS-20 offers a concise, three-dimensional short form of the parent CSRS for settings where a brief measure of individual CSR is needed. Rather than reproducing the five domains of the full scale, it captures three empirically robust dimensions and provides initial multi-country evidence in young-adult, university-based samples. It is particularly suited to multi-construct survey designs where questionnaire length is a constraint.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Computer Security
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ics-05-2026-0294
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A short form of the cybersecurity resilience scale (CSRS-20): development and initial cross-cultural validation

İbrahim Arpacı, Naurin Farooq Khan, Mehmet Akif Çifçi
Information and Computer Security
Information and Cyber Security
article

A short form of the cybersecurity resilience scale (CSRS-20): development and initial cross-cultural validation

İbrahim Arpacı, Naurin Farooq Khan, Mehmet Akif Çifçi
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study conducted a psychometric evaluation of a 20-item short form of the Cybersecurity Resilience Scale (CSRS-20), designed to reduce respondent burden while retaining the core conceptual coverage. The short form focuses on individual-level cybersecurity resilience (CSR), defined as the capacity to recognize, respond to and recover from cybersecurity threats through increasingly advanced protective behaviors. The purpose of this study was to conduct a psychometric evaluation of a 20-item short form of the Cybersecurity Resilience Scale (CSRS-20). Design/methodology/approach A two-stage validation procedure was used. First, item reduction and exploratory analyses with a Turkish sample (n = 805) produced a 20-item version. Because the advanced behavioral domains did not separate empirically once the item pool was reduced, the short form resolved into three dimensions rather than the five of the parent scale. Second, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with an independent international sample (n = 1,040) from Pakistan, Kuwait and Türkiye tested the stability of this three-factor structure. Additional analyses assessed reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, measurement invariance and nomological validity. Findings A three-factor structure fit the data well and outperformed one-factor and bifactor alternatives. Internal consistency was strong for all three dimensions. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported, and the reduction to three dimensions resolved the discriminant-validity overlap observed among the advanced domains of the full-length scale. Multi-group CFA supported configural and metric invariance across the three national samples, suggesting that the factor structure and factor loadings were comparable across groups. Nomological analyses showed theoretically consistent associations between CSRS-20 scores, theory of planned behavior constructs and perceptions of educational sustainability in AI-supported learning contexts. Originality/value The CSRS-20 offers a concise, three-dimensional short form of the parent CSRS for settings where a brief measure of individual CSR is needed. Rather than reproducing the five domains of the full scale, it captures three empirically robust dimensions and provides initial multi-country evidence in young-adult, university-based samples. It is particularly suited to multi-construct survey designs where questionnaire length is a constraint.

Information and Computer Security
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR), Duy Tan University (VN), Riphah International University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.