Existential Predictors of AI Anxiety: A Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT The present study explored associations between individual‐difference variables and artificial intelligence (AI) anxiety using self‐reported online questionnaires completed by 221 participants. The variables included existential reflection, existential anxiety, curiosity and exploration, AI literacy, and general anxiety, alongside sociodemographic variables such as gender, age, and job exposure to AI. A multiple regression model, which accounted for 23.7% of the variance in AI anxiety scores ( R 2 = 0.237, adjusted R 2 = 0.214), showed that higher existential anxiety and higher existential reflection were independently associated with higher AI anxiety, whereas higher AI literacy was associated with lower AI anxiety. The findings highlight the importance of existential concerns and AI literacy in understanding individual differences in AI anxiety. They also suggest that AI‐related anxiety should not be regarded solely as a symptom to be reduced: within a humanistic‐existential framework, it may sometimes represent a meaningful response to perceived changes in human agency, identity, and purpose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Humanistic Counseling
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/johc.70065
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Existential Predictors of AI Anxiety: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Omar Yousaf, Fernand R. Gobet, Francesca Chatfield-Jouin, Nancy Evans
The Journal of Humanistic Counseling
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Existential Predictors of AI Anxiety: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Omar Yousaf, Fernand R. Gobet, Francesca Chatfield-Jouin, Nancy Evans
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study explored associations between individual‐difference variables and artificial intelligence (AI) anxiety using self‐reported online questionnaires completed by 221 participants. The variables included existential reflection, existential anxiety, curiosity and exploration, AI literacy, and general anxiety, alongside sociodemographic variables such as gender, age, and job exposure to AI. A multiple regression model, which accounted for 23.7% of the variance in AI anxiety scores ( R 2 = 0.237, adjusted R 2 = 0.214), showed that higher existential anxiety and higher existential reflection were independently associated with higher AI anxiety, whereas higher AI literacy was associated with lower AI anxiety. The findings highlight the importance of existential concerns and AI literacy in understanding individual differences in AI anxiety. They also suggest that AI‐related anxiety should not be regarded solely as a symptom to be reduced: within a humanistic‐existential framework, it may sometimes represent a meaningful response to perceived changes in human agency, identity, and purpose.

The Journal of Humanistic Counseling
University of Hertfordshire (GB), University of Roehampton (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Existential Predictors of AI Anxiety: A Cross‐Sectional Study — Omar Yousaf, Fernand R. Gobet, et al. · The Journal of Humanistic Counseling (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS