Path selection of urban‑scale regulation policies in China in the new era: a perspective from utilizing positive agglomeration externalities

Agglomeration economy is the core driving force for urban development, and its externality provides space for policy intervention. China’s urban‑scale regulation policies mostly focus on the governance of negative agglomeration externalities, while paying insufficient attention to policies oriented towards the utilization of positive agglomeration externalities. This article constructs a spatial equilibrium model integrating positive agglomeration externalities to theoretically analyse the path selection of urban‑scale regulation policies. The research finds that the policy of fully internalizing agglomeration economy through wage subsidies is the theoretically optimal policy, as it can fully release the benefits of agglomeration economy and maximize social surplus. Without instruments to internalize agglomeration economy, the differentiated land development tax policy based on the gap between social marginal productivity and average productivity can guide the population to cities with high-level agglomeration economy and effectively control the excessive creation of new cities, thereby improving the utilization efficiency of agglomeration economy and social surplus. Therefore, it serves as a feasible suboptimal policy. The uniform development subsidy or tax policy that ignores the heterogeneity of urban agglomeration economy aggravates the imbalance of urban‑scale distribution through misaligned incentives or excessive constraints, making it an inferior policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2734527
Primary Topic
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Path selection of urban‑scale regulation policies in China in the new era: a perspective from utilizing positive agglomeration externalities

Jiazhen Du, Dongwei Guo, Yingming Zhu, Suxia Liu
Applied Economics
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
article

Path selection of urban‑scale regulation policies in China in the new era: a perspective from utilizing positive agglomeration externalities

Jiazhen Du, Dongwei Guo, Yingming Zhu, Suxia Liu
article en

Abstract

Agglomeration economy is the core driving force for urban development, and its externality provides space for policy intervention. China’s urban‑scale regulation policies mostly focus on the governance of negative agglomeration externalities, while paying insufficient attention to policies oriented towards the utilization of positive agglomeration externalities. This article constructs a spatial equilibrium model integrating positive agglomeration externalities to theoretically analyse the path selection of urban‑scale regulation policies. The research finds that the policy of fully internalizing agglomeration economy through wage subsidies is the theoretically optimal policy, as it can fully release the benefits of agglomeration economy and maximize social surplus. Without instruments to internalize agglomeration economy, the differentiated land development tax policy based on the gap between social marginal productivity and average productivity can guide the population to cities with high-level agglomeration economy and effectively control the excessive creation of new cities, thereby improving the utilization efficiency of agglomeration economy and social surplus. Therefore, it serves as a feasible suboptimal policy. The uniform development subsidy or tax policy that ignores the heterogeneity of urban agglomeration economy aggravates the imbalance of urban‑scale distribution through misaligned incentives or excessive constraints, making it an inferior policy.

Applied Economics
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.