Molecular mechanisms linking food processing to the human gut microbiome and metabolic health: A critical review

Abstract Food processing can improve safety, shelf life, digestibility and sensory quality, but it can also alter the food matrix, remove microbiota‐accessible substrates and introduce additives or heat‐derived compounds that modify host–microbe interactions. This critical review evaluates how mechanical, thermal, fermentative and ultra‐processing practices influence the human gut microbiota and metabolic health. A structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar was conducted for peer‐reviewed studies published from January 2010 to July 2026, with priority given to human controlled‐feeding trials, randomized interventions and large observational studies. The strongest human evidence indicates that processing‐related effects are heterogeneous rather than uniformly harmful. Refined and ultra‐processed dietary patterns can increase energy intake and are associated with adverse metabolic outcomes, while small controlled studies show that specific emulsifiers and non‐nutritive sweeteners can alter microbiota composition or function in susceptible individuals. Conversely, whole‐grain and fermented‐food interventions can increase short‐chain fatty acid production, microbial functional capacity or diversity. Mechanistically, food processing acts through changes in particle size, starch structure, fibre accessibility, polyphenol bioavailability, additive exposure, advanced glycation end products, bile acid metabolism and intestinal barrier integrity. However, much of the mechanistic literature remains preclinical, and processing level is frequently confounded by nutrient quality and dietary pattern. Future research should use standardized processing descriptors, metagenomic and metabolomic endpoints, adequately powered controlled diets and long‐term multi‐ethnic cohorts. Food design should preserve beneficial matrices and fermentable substrates while minimizing unnecessary additives and excessive thermal damage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JSFA reports
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsf2.70098
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Molecular mechanisms linking food processing to the human gut microbiome and metabolic health: A critical review

Elijah Kolawole Oladipo, Helen N. Onyeaka, Oluwatosin Tumininu Olasinde, Oluwaseyi Samuel Akinpelu et al.
JSFA reports
Food composition and properties
article

Molecular mechanisms linking food processing to the human gut microbiome and metabolic health: A critical review

Elijah Kolawole Oladipo, Helen N. Onyeaka, Oluwatosin Tumininu Olasinde, Oluwaseyi Samuel Akinpelu, Christian Chibuike Aguoru, Anyaoha Emmanuel Obinna, Oyeyiola Olawumi Hezekiah, Diovu Charles Chinedu, Olakanmi Oluwakemi Deborah, Babarinde Jesulayomi Mercy, Ojo Oluwalonimi Christiana
article en

Abstract

Abstract Food processing can improve safety, shelf life, digestibility and sensory quality, but it can also alter the food matrix, remove microbiota‐accessible substrates and introduce additives or heat‐derived compounds that modify host–microbe interactions. This critical review evaluates how mechanical, thermal, fermentative and ultra‐processing practices influence the human gut microbiota and metabolic health. A structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar was conducted for peer‐reviewed studies published from January 2010 to July 2026, with priority given to human controlled‐feeding trials, randomized interventions and large observational studies. The strongest human evidence indicates that processing‐related effects are heterogeneous rather than uniformly harmful. Refined and ultra‐processed dietary patterns can increase energy intake and are associated with adverse metabolic outcomes, while small controlled studies show that specific emulsifiers and non‐nutritive sweeteners can alter microbiota composition or function in susceptible individuals. Conversely, whole‐grain and fermented‐food interventions can increase short‐chain fatty acid production, microbial functional capacity or diversity. Mechanistically, food processing acts through changes in particle size, starch structure, fibre accessibility, polyphenol bioavailability, additive exposure, advanced glycation end products, bile acid metabolism and intestinal barrier integrity. However, much of the mechanistic literature remains preclinical, and processing level is frequently confounded by nutrient quality and dietary pattern. Future research should use standardized processing descriptors, metagenomic and metabolomic endpoints, adequately powered controlled diets and long‐term multi‐ethnic cohorts. Food design should preserve beneficial matrices and fermentable substrates while minimizing unnecessary additives and excessive thermal damage.

JSFA reports
Birmingham City University (GB), Enugu State University of Science and Technology (NG), Federal University of Technology Owerri (NG), Adeleke University (NG), University College Birmingham (GB), Osun State University (NG), Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (NG), University of Birmingham (GB), Michael Okpara University of Agriculture (NG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Food composition and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.