Real-World Application of Distributional (Utility) Weighting in Benefit–Cost Analysis Using Microdata

Abstract Utility weighting in benefit–cost analysis (sometimes misleadingly referred to using the more general term “distributional weighting”) has, in almost all cases to date, been conducted with data on income ―and on costs and benefits― in income bins or at the geographic unit level, with weights computed at the bin midpoints or average income in a geographic unit. These methods have several shortcomings that cause bias: not accounting for taxes and transfers, not accounting for household composition, incorrect computation of weights, and not accounting for increasing or decreasing distribution of income or impact within bins. These shortcomings are addressed by using a recently developed method using microdata, which also allows for a wider range of applications. I apply this method to real world utility-weighting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2026.10057
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Real-World Application of Distributional (Utility) Weighting in Benefit–Cost Analysis Using Microdata

Daniel J. Acland
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Real-World Application of Distributional (Utility) Weighting in Benefit–Cost Analysis Using Microdata

Daniel J. Acland
article en

Abstract

Abstract Utility weighting in benefit–cost analysis (sometimes misleadingly referred to using the more general term “distributional weighting”) has, in almost all cases to date, been conducted with data on income ―and on costs and benefits― in income bins or at the geographic unit level, with weights computed at the bin midpoints or average income in a geographic unit. These methods have several shortcomings that cause bias: not accounting for taxes and transfers, not accounting for household composition, incorrect computation of weights, and not accounting for increasing or decreasing distribution of income or impact within bins. These shortcomings are addressed by using a recently developed method using microdata, which also allows for a wider range of applications. I apply this method to real world utility-weighting.

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
University of California System (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Real-World Application of Distributional (Utility) Weighting in Benefit–Cost Analysis Using Microdata — Daniel J. Acland · Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS