Planned Impella 5.5 Support via Brachiocephalic Artery or Ascending Aorta for Low Ejection Fraction, High-Risk Cardiac Surgery

Background: Surgically implanted microaxial flow pumps are increasingly being utilized to treat cardiogenic shock; however, data on their use in the realm of cardiac surgery are scarce. We report our single-institution experience in low-ejection-fraction, high-risk patients with a planned weaning strategy from cardiopulmonary bypass directly to Impella 5.5 inserted via the brachiocephalic artery or ascending aorta following corrective cardiac surgery. Methods: A prospectively maintained institutional database was queried from 2022 through to 2025. Primary endpoints included feasibility of implantation, weaning rate, and bedside removal; secondary endpoints included freedom from all-cause mortality at discharge and 1 year, in-hospital thromboembolic complications, postoperative pharmacologic hemodynamic support using vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), de novo renal failure, and revision for bleeding. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results: Sixteen patients (median age 66.5 years [IQR; interquartile range, 52.5–70.0], STS score 12.1% [IQR, 5.3–14.2%] and EF 20.0% [IQR, 15.0–31.5%]) underwent coronary revascularization (n = 6), valve procedures (n = 4) or a combination thereof (n = 6) and were weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass to Impella 5.5 implanted via the ascending aorta (25%) or brachiocephalic artery (75%). Primary endpoints were met in 100% (feasibility of implantation), 94% (weaning rate), and 100% (bedside removal). In terms of secondary endpoints, freedom from mortality at discharge and one year was 94.8%; there were two non-disabling strokes (12.6%) while still on Impella 5.5 support; the median VIS at the time of ICU arrival was 12.8 (IQR 10.8–22.1); renal failure occurred in two patients and four patients required revision for bleeding. Conclusions: Impella 5.5-supported cardiac surgery appears safe and may open a new avenue for high-risk patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13100475
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Planned Impella 5.5 Support via Brachiocephalic Artery or Ascending Aorta for Low Ejection Fraction, High-Risk Cardiac Surgery

Pimchanok Junnil, Andreas Habertheuer, Akinobu Itoh, Sameer A Hirji et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Planned Impella 5.5 Support via Brachiocephalic Artery or Ascending Aorta for Low Ejection Fraction, High-Risk Cardiac Surgery

Pimchanok Junnil, Andreas Habertheuer, Akinobu Itoh, Sameer A Hirji, Margaret R. Connolly, Anjeli Reyes Macaranas, Amy E Hackmann, Thoralf M. Sundt
article en

Abstract

Background: Surgically implanted microaxial flow pumps are increasingly being utilized to treat cardiogenic shock; however, data on their use in the realm of cardiac surgery are scarce. We report our single-institution experience in low-ejection-fraction, high-risk patients with a planned weaning strategy from cardiopulmonary bypass directly to Impella 5.5 inserted via the brachiocephalic artery or ascending aorta following corrective cardiac surgery. Methods: A prospectively maintained institutional database was queried from 2022 through to 2025. Primary endpoints included feasibility of implantation, weaning rate, and bedside removal; secondary endpoints included freedom from all-cause mortality at discharge and 1 year, in-hospital thromboembolic complications, postoperative pharmacologic hemodynamic support using vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), de novo renal failure, and revision for bleeding. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results: Sixteen patients (median age 66.5 years [IQR; interquartile range, 52.5–70.0], STS score 12.1% [IQR, 5.3–14.2%] and EF 20.0% [IQR, 15.0–31.5%]) underwent coronary revascularization (n = 6), valve procedures (n = 4) or a combination thereof (n = 6) and were weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass to Impella 5.5 implanted via the ascending aorta (25%) or brachiocephalic artery (75%). Primary endpoints were met in 100% (feasibility of implantation), 94% (weaning rate), and 100% (bedside removal). In terms of secondary endpoints, freedom from mortality at discharge and one year was 94.8%; there were two non-disabling strokes (12.6%) while still on Impella 5.5 support; the median VIS at the time of ICU arrival was 12.8 (IQR 10.8–22.1); renal failure occurred in two patients and four patients required revision for bleeding. Conclusions: Impella 5.5-supported cardiac surgery appears safe and may open a new avenue for high-risk patients.

Journal of Cardiovascular Development and DiseaseVol. 13(10)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.