Lithium‐Ion Battery Storage: A Cross‐Scale Review From the Energy Storage Ecosystem to Application‐Specific Management

ABSTRACT Energy storage underpins the decarbonization of power systems, and lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) have become the dominant platform for modular, fast‐response deployment in both stationary and mobile applications. However, LIB research is frequently examined in isolation from the wider storage landscape, leaving its technological positioning, applicability boundaries, and systemic role insufficiently clarified. This study establishes the linkage from field‐wide storage functions through application‐specific duty cycles to degradation pathways and battery management priorities, thereby translating bibliometric structures into deployment‐oriented guidance. Two logically nested corpora were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection for 2021–2025, comprising 30 141 records for the field‐wide layer and 8902 for the focused layer, and document co‐citation networks were constructed in CiteSpace. The field‐wide map resolves into a three‐dimensional structure spanning technical characteristics, operational optimization and intelligent management, and application scenarios and business models. The focused map differentiates into stationary storage and electric vehicle branches, compared in duty cycles, degradation drivers, battery management priorities, and end‐of‐life roles. The synthesis explicitly maps stationary duty cycles to corresponding degradation pathways and emphasizes path‐dependent prognostics under dynamic operating sequences, addressing the gap between laboratory testing and field deployment. The review synthesizes progress in advanced battery management, system integration, and circular life cycle strategies, with each technical direction mapped to its underlying economic mechanism across four analytical layers. Three research priorities are identified: evidence from real operation across the full life cycle, state perception coupling multiple physical domains, and intelligent coordination of diverse storage technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Storage
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.70529
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Lithium‐Ion Battery Storage: A Cross‐Scale Review From the Energy Storage Ecosystem to Application‐Specific Management

Huaihai Yi, Ruifeng Shi, Jing Teng, Lingzhi Zhang et al.
Energy Storage
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Lithium‐Ion Battery Storage: A Cross‐Scale Review From the Energy Storage Ecosystem to Application‐Specific Management

Huaihai Yi, Ruifeng Shi, Jing Teng, Lingzhi Zhang, Yuanxing Zhang, Xiang Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Energy storage underpins the decarbonization of power systems, and lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) have become the dominant platform for modular, fast‐response deployment in both stationary and mobile applications. However, LIB research is frequently examined in isolation from the wider storage landscape, leaving its technological positioning, applicability boundaries, and systemic role insufficiently clarified. This study establishes the linkage from field‐wide storage functions through application‐specific duty cycles to degradation pathways and battery management priorities, thereby translating bibliometric structures into deployment‐oriented guidance. Two logically nested corpora were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection for 2021–2025, comprising 30 141 records for the field‐wide layer and 8902 for the focused layer, and document co‐citation networks were constructed in CiteSpace. The field‐wide map resolves into a three‐dimensional structure spanning technical characteristics, operational optimization and intelligent management, and application scenarios and business models. The focused map differentiates into stationary storage and electric vehicle branches, compared in duty cycles, degradation drivers, battery management priorities, and end‐of‐life roles. The synthesis explicitly maps stationary duty cycles to corresponding degradation pathways and emphasizes path‐dependent prognostics under dynamic operating sequences, addressing the gap between laboratory testing and field deployment. The review synthesizes progress in advanced battery management, system integration, and circular life cycle strategies, with each technical direction mapped to its underlying economic mechanism across four analytical layers. Three research priorities are identified: evidence from real operation across the full life cycle, state perception coupling multiple physical domains, and intelligent coordination of diverse storage technologies.

Energy StorageVol. 8(7)
North China Electric Power University (CN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.