Integrating Tumour Biology into Surgical Decision-Making for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Analysis Adapted for Clinical Colorectal Cancer

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is biologically heterogeneous, resulting in variable outcomes despite similar disease burden and treatment. Although metastasectomy offers the only potentially curative option for selected patients, surgical selection remains largely anatomy based. Whether biological factors continue to influence outcomes after resection remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 290 consecutive patients with stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma treated at a Brazilian tertiary oncology centre (2003–2019). Tumour sidedness, RAS mutational status, and metastasectomy were evaluated for overall survival (OS) using Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression in the overall cohort and the metastasectomy subgroup. Results: Median OS was 40.2 months. Patients undergoing metastasectomy had significantly longer survival than those managed non-operatively (median 116.0 vs. 30.1 months; 5-year OS 63% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). The following variables remained independently associated with improved survival: metastasectomy (HR 4.58, 95% CI 2.82–7.44; p < 0.001), RAS status (wild type vs. mutated: HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.65–4.64; p < 0.001), age (>70 ys vs. ≤ 70 HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.92; p = 0.021) and metastatic presentation (synchronous vs. metachronous: HR 0.61 95% CI 0.39–0.95; p = 0.028). RAS status remained associated with survival in patients undergoing metastasectomy (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.46–9.60; p = 0.006). Conclusions: Tumour biology remains a dominant determinant of survival in mCRC even after metastasectomy. These data challenge purely anatomy-based surgical paradigms and support integrating molecular and clinicopathological risk into post-resection management and treatment planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18193070
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Integrating Tumour Biology into Surgical Decision-Making for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Analysis Adapted for Clinical Colorectal Cancer

Mariana Paula Cunha Gonçalves, Henrique Araujo Lima, Vívian Resende, Pedro Henrique Faria Silva Trocoli-Couto et al.
Cancers
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Integrating Tumour Biology into Surgical Decision-Making for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Cohort Analysis Adapted for Clinical Colorectal Cancer

Mariana Paula Cunha Gonçalves, Henrique Araujo Lima, Vívian Resende, Pedro Henrique Faria Silva Trocoli-Couto, Augusto Henrique Marchiodi, Lucas Toledo Bernardo de Carvalho, Yuiti Pedro Henrique Yamashita
article en

Abstract

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is biologically heterogeneous, resulting in variable outcomes despite similar disease burden and treatment. Although metastasectomy offers the only potentially curative option for selected patients, surgical selection remains largely anatomy based. Whether biological factors continue to influence outcomes after resection remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 290 consecutive patients with stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma treated at a Brazilian tertiary oncology centre (2003–2019). Tumour sidedness, RAS mutational status, and metastasectomy were evaluated for overall survival (OS) using Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression in the overall cohort and the metastasectomy subgroup. Results: Median OS was 40.2 months. Patients undergoing metastasectomy had significantly longer survival than those managed non-operatively (median 116.0 vs. 30.1 months; 5-year OS 63% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). The following variables remained independently associated with improved survival: metastasectomy (HR 4.58, 95% CI 2.82–7.44; p < 0.001), RAS status (wild type vs. mutated: HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.65–4.64; p < 0.001), age (>70 ys vs. ≤ 70 HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.92; p = 0.021) and metastatic presentation (synchronous vs. metachronous: HR 0.61 95% CI 0.39–0.95; p = 0.028). RAS status remained associated with survival in patients undergoing metastasectomy (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.46–9.60; p = 0.006). Conclusions: Tumour biology remains a dominant determinant of survival in mCRC even after metastasectomy. These data challenge purely anatomy-based surgical paradigms and support integrating molecular and clinicopathological risk into post-resection management and treatment planning.

CancersVol. 18(19)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Grupo Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.